[PJMedia.com] In times of national emergency, should the Supreme Court dictate America's grand strategy and international economic policies?

This question confronts the justices this week inLearning Resources v. Trump, a case that puts the president's tariff powers to the test.

If President Donald Trump loses, the Treasury faces having to refund more than $100 billion in tariff revenue, and the president's trade strategy will be thrown into chaos.

Businesses that have already changed their operations because of the tariffs, drawing jobs and supply chains back to America, will be subject to grave new uncertainties: Will Trump find other legal grounds for his tariffs or will his project collapse, throwing the country back to an era of unfettered globalization?

The law Trump relies on most for his tariffs is the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, or IEEP, which gives him broad powers to "regulate" international trade when the president declares an emergency.

Trump has declared both the trade deficit and the fentanyl crisis to be emergencies under IEEP.

But critics argue the legislation doesn't authorize tariffs—tariffs are taxes, they say, and the Constitution only gives Congress power to tax.

Yet obviously it's the president who collects taxes, and by giving the president emergency economic powers to deal with international problems, Congress may logically have given the president power to collect tariffs at whatever rate he deems necessary.

The law allows the president to go so far as to suspend trade with a foreign country and impose crippling economic sanctions at his discretion.

If a president can do that much under IEEP, he must be able to take the less drastic step of regulating trade through penalties—tariffs—on foreign producers.

If the Supreme Court accepts that line of argument, however, it still leaves the question of whether the country is indeed in an emergency. (Image: Pixabay)

We've had trade deficits since about 1970, consistently; what makes today's any different?

What's changed is they've reached critical mass, not only in Trump's determination but in the opinion of the American public, which elected the "tariff man" last year knowing exactly what he planned to do about industrial decline.

The IEEP lets the president—not the courts—make the call about emergencies emanating from abroad.

To rule IEEP itself is unconstitutional would be a breathtaking intervention by the Supreme Court, seizing power not only from the president but from Congress itself.

Determining the scope of emergency action is something the American people must have a say about, which makes this a matter for the elected branches of government.

If voters don't like how presidents use emergency powers under IEEP, they can elect a Congress that will change the law.

Two branches have to cooperate to give the president this power, and the people... Subscribe for free to Breaking Christian News here

Continue reading Here.

To receive daily emails from Breaking Christian News to your inbox CLICK HERE

WATCH – ICE Agents Pass Out Water to Grateful Travelers: 'They're Here Doing a Job'

No, Texans and Floridians Do NOT Pay Twice the Taxes Paid by Californians

The Tide Is Turning on Transgender Ideology, but Democrats Haven't Caught Up

'Monster' Abortionist Dies in Prison

GOP Congresswoman Introduces Bill to Stop Abortion Pill from Polluting Water Supply

Panic Move Fails—Court Slaps Down Dem AG Bid to Block Recount of Seized Ballots Amid 45,000 Vote Discrepancy

Consent Decree Marks Final Defeat of 'Orwellian' Biden 'Censorship Regime'

Hostage Freed: American Dennis Coyle Lands in Texas after over a Year in Taliban Captivity

Iran's Islamic Regime Rejects Trump Ceasefire Plan, Dismisses Diplomatic Efforts

Baptisms in the Ocean: Signs of Revival in Cancun

From Abortion to Redemption: Stories of Life Took Center Stage at California's March for Life

'These Monuments Matter': White House Installs Revived Christopher Columbus Statue Leftists Destroyed in 2020-PHOTOS

Drones, Data, and the Soldiers Rewriting Warfare: Inside the Army's New Approach

What People (and MSM) Need to Understand about Iran, and What President Trump Undoubtedly Knows

Two Air Canada Pilots Identified; Their Actions Likely Saved the Lives of Their Passengers

Poll: 83% Of Voters Think Ballots 'Should Be Received by Election Day'

Democrats Predicted ICE Would Terrorize Airports. Here's What Actually Happened

Freed Korean Pastor after Controversial Arrest, Credits God's Grace, Prayer and US Intervention

Pro-Family Tech Coalition Launches to Protect Kids from AI Threats

Poll: Most Americans Back Limits on School Activism