To receive daily emails from Breaking Christian News to your inbox CLICK HERE
Supreme Court Rules Republican Lawmakers Can Defend North Carolina's Voter Integrity Laws“It should go without saying that a State may take action to prevent election fraud without waiting for it to occur and be detected within its own borders." -Excerpt from majority opinion
The decision overturned a lower court's ruling that the Republicans could not help defend North Carolina's law requiring in-person and absentee voters to present any one of 10 forms of photo identification. "The 8-1 decision did not deal directly with the lawfulness of the voter law, but rather which government bodies can defend the law in court," The Hill reports. "The 8-1 decision doesn't end the more than three-year dispute over the voter ID law, which is not currently in effect and has been challenged in both state and federal court," WSOC TV explains: "The law requires voters to show a photo ID to vote—whether it's a driver's license, a passport or certain student and local government identifications. "North Carolina Democratic Gov. Roy Cooper vetoed the measure, but lawmakers overrode his veto to pass the law." In the majority opinion, Justice Neil Gorsuch explained the basis for the court's 8-1 decision: "Through the General Assembly, the people of North Carolina have authorized the leaders of their legislature to defend duly enacted state statutes against constitutional challenge. Ordinarily, a federal court must respect that kind of sovereign choice, not assemble presumptions against it." Justice Sonia Sotomayor cast the lone dissenting vote. According to USA Today, partisan politics have made North Carolina's voter integrity laws particularly contentious: "State Senate leader Philip Berger and Timothy Moore, the speaker of the North Carolina House, both Republicans, sought to intervene because the law is being defended in federal court by a Democratic attorney general. The decision may help guide similar conflicts in states where the legislative and executive branches are controlled by different parties." What's more, the Supreme Court issued a similar decision earlier this year: "In March, an 8-1 majority of the Supreme Court allowed Kentucky's Republican attorney general to step in to defend a state ban on a common abortion procedure. But in that case, Kentucky's Democratic governor declined to defend the law. In the North Carolina dispute, Democratic officials have continued to defend the new election requirements." And, last July, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Arizona's election integrity laws requiring in-precinct voting and voter identification, which had been overturned due to claims of racial discrimination. According to the majority opinion: "It should go without saying that a State may take action to prevent election fraud without waiting for it to occur and be detected within its own borders. "Neither Arizona's out-of-precinct rule nor its ballot-collection law violates Section 2 of the VRA. Arizona's out-of-precinct rule enforces the requirement that voters who choose to vote in person on election day must do so in their assigned precincts. Having to identify one's own polling place and then travel there to vote does not exceed the ‘usual burdens of voting.'" Subscribe for free to Breaking Christian News here
To receive daily emails from Breaking Christian News to your inbox CLICK HERE
Other Recent Articles from Breaking Christian News 3,000-year-old prophecy being fulfilled today Court Victory: No Contempt Charges or Fines, Calvary Chapel San Jose Wins Again These Two Amendments Are Trump's Friend Right Now Wyoming to Cheney: You're Fired! Trump-Backed Hageman Wins Easily Tony and Lauren Dungy Have Fostered 100 Children: They're 'in Crisis' and 'Need a Home' Why You Can't Believe What the UN or Mainstream Media Say About Israel Report: That Single Payer Thing Isn't Working Out for UK Trump tells Fox News US is in 'Very Dangerous' Place Following FBI Raid of Mar-a-Lago Residence By What Authority? Former DOJ Official Baffled by Biden Investigation of Southern Baptist Convention 'Humanitarian Tragedy': One Year after the Taliban Captured Kabul Breitbart Exclusive Photos: 700 Migrants Cross in Five Hours at Texas Border Town Conservative Students Sue College for Being Treated Like 'Second-Class Citizens' Search the Articles Archives |
All articles on this site and emails from BCN are copyrighted property of Breaking Christian News. Permission is given to link to, or share a BCN story if proper attribution is given to both the original writer and summarizer of the story. Breaking Christian News 2005-2019. All Rights Reserved.
Breaking Christian News is a division of Elijah List Publications, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Disclaimer: Articles and links, as well as the source articles linked to; do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Breaking Christian News.
Home | Store | Subscribe | Facebook | Article Archive |