The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit on Wednesday reversed previous court rulings that blocked the pro-life law. Some court watchers say the case may ultimately end up before the US Supreme Court.

The 2017 law, which passed the Texas Legislature with bipartisan support has never been enforced because of legal challenges. It prohibits the use of forceps to tear the unborn baby apart limb from limb to remove from the mother's womb without first using an injected drug or a suction procedure to ensure the child is dead.

A three-judge panel from the federal court blocked enforcement of the law last year. But Texas sought and was granted a rehearing by the full court.

A majority among the 14 appellate judges who heard arguments in January sided with Texas (three of the court's 17 active judges were recused). The opinion, by judges Jennifer Walker Elrod and Don Willett, said "the record shows that doctors can safely perform D&Es and comply with SB8 using methods that are already in widespread use."

Judge James Dennis wrote a dissent on behalf of himself and judges Carl Stewart and James Graves. A separate dissent was written by Judge Stephen Higginson, joined by Gregg Costa.

Dennis said the Texas law, "under the guise of regulation, makes it a felony to perform the most common and safe abortion procedure employed during the second trimester."

Texas Right to Life, a pro-life organization applauded the court's ruling.

"If the abortion industry appeals today's decision, the Supreme Court must answer the case's dynamic legal question: 'Is a dismemberment abortion inhumane enough to warrant legal prohibition?'" the organization's statement said. "The evident answer to this targeted question directly undermines some of the Supreme Court's central premises in their abortion jurisprudence, such as the misconception that pre-viability abortions are more ethical than those that occur after viability."

"Texans celebrate today's long-awaited victory," Texas Right to Life Director of Media and Communication Kimberlyn Schwartz said. "Anyone can see the cruelty of dismemberment abortions, ripping a child's body apart while her heart is still beating. We're grateful the judges recognized this horror."

Nancy Northup, president, and CEO of the Center for Reproductive Rights, said her group is analyzing the decision and considering all legal options.

"Texas has been Hell-bent on legislating abortion out of existence, and it is galling that a federal court would uphold a law that so clearly defies decades of Supreme Court precedent," Northup said.

Alliance Defending Freedom, a nonprofit legal organization, filed a friend-of-the-court brief with the 5th Circuit in favor of upholding the Texas law.

"Texas has the right to respect the life of unborn children, and it did so when it chose to strictly limit the gruesome procedure of dismemberment abortions. The 5th Circuit was on solid ground to reverse the lower court's decision striking down the law, finding that 'the district court committed numerous, reversible legal and factual errors," noted Alliance Defending Freedom Legal Counsel Elissa Graves.

"What the Texas law, SB 8, forbids is causing an unborn child's death by 'corporal dismemberment,' in which the child dies 'by bleeding to death as his or her body is torn apart.' SB 8 prohibits the use of this grisly and unnecessary method before the death of the unborn child," Graves added. "The law is both humane and constitutional. As the 5th Circuit rightly found, the abortionists who filed this lawsuit 'have utterly failed to carry their heavy burden of showing that SB8 imposes an undue burden on a large fraction of women in the relevant circumstances."

Meanwhile, the Texas Heartbeat Act is slated to take effect September 1, protecting preborn children as early as six weeks, when the baby's heartbeat is detectable by the most common methods.

The Texas Heartbeat Act takes a novel approach, allowing for citizens to hold abortionists accountable through private lawsuits.

As CBN News reported last month, a group of abortion providers filed a federal lawsuit against Texas officials to stop the bill. 

A hearing is scheduled for Aug. 30. Subscribe for free to Breaking Christian News here

To receive daily emails from Breaking Christian News to your inbox CLICK HERE

Good News: Massachusetts Reverses Gender Ideology Mandate for Foster Parents

Suspect in VP Vance Home Vandalism Had Multiple Run-ins With the Law, Demanded to Be Called 'Julia'

Hegseth Launches 'Arsenal of Freedom' Tour, Tells Shipbuilders: National Security Starts Here

President Trump Blocks US Chip Sale to Chinese-Owned Company

President Trump Promises Support for Iranian Protestors

Maduro's Capture Raises Questions of US Election Fraud Linked to Venezuelan Voting Machines

Maduro's Capture Raises Questions of US Election Fraud Linked to Venezuelan Voting Machines

A Mouthy and Defiant Maduro Makes First Court Appearance, Enters a Plea

Switzerland Freezes Nicolás Maduro's Assets, Will Redistribute Funds to Venezuelans after Trial

Maine Mom Asks Supreme Court to Protect Parental Rights after School Hides Child's Transition

North Carolina Officially Recognizes Male and Female as the Only Two Sexes

Secretary Hegseth Demotes Mark Kelly And Issues Censure over 'Seditious Six' Video

Tim Walz to Drop Reelection Bid Amid Fraud Scandal

Trump: Cuba 'Is Ready to Fall'

Venezuelan Exiles Confront Pro-Maduro Protests Abroad as Global Celebrations Mark Regime's Fall

HUGE: Iranian Revolution Underway as Freedom Fighting Iranians Take Over, Khamenei Planning His Exit

Dictator Nicolás Maduro and Wife Captured: President Trump Announces Major Victory in Venezuelan Drug War

Will Graham: Satisfy Your Longing Soul in 2026

Top New Year's Resolutions: Americans Want More Family Time and Prayer in 2026

'Hero' Mom Jumps into Water to Save 4-year-old Daughter Who Fell Between Cruise Ship and Dock