To receive daily emails from Breaking Christian News to your inbox CLICK HERE


SHARE THIS ARTICLE Printer friendly version of this page

Supreme Court: Roberts Sides with Liberal Justices, Narrowly Striking Down Louisiana's Abortion Admitting Privileges Law

Nancy Flanders : Jun 29, 2020  LiveAction.org

The disappointing decision will allow abortionists in Louisiana to continue to use their victims as a legal shield to continue to operate unchecked. While doctors at all other ambulatory surgical facilities in the state must have admitting privileges at local hospitals, abortionists in the state have avoided this requirement and will continue to do so.

[LiveAction.org] The Supreme Court of the United States issued a 5 to 4 ruling today, stating that Louisiana's Act 620, dubbed "The Unsafe Abortion Protection Act," is unconstitutional. Chief Justice John Roberts sided with the liberals on the Court. The case of June Medical Services v. Russo was the first abortion-related case to be heard by both Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh, considered to be conservative-leading judges, and signifies that the court is also likely unwilling to overturn Roe v. Wade or to allow states to pass commonsense abortion restrictions. (Image: Chief Justice John Roberts /Screengrab-YouTube /via The American Conservative)

The decision of the Court states, "Louisiana's Act 620 imposes a burden on access to abortion just as severe as that imposed by the early identical Texas law invalidated four years ago in Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt," and therefore, "cannot stand under principles of stare decisis."

In his dissenting opinion, Justice Neil Gorsuch, a recent Trump appointee, wrote about his belief that abortion providers shouldn't have standing to file suit on behalf of "an undefined, unnamed, indeed unknown, group of women who they hope will be their patients in the future":

After overlooking so many facts and the deference owed to the legislative process, today's decision misapplies many of the rules that normally constrain the judicial process. Start with the question who can sue. To establish standing in federal court, a plaintiff typically must assert an injury to her own legally protected interests—not the rights of someone else...

No one even attempts to suggest this usual prerequisite is satisfied here. The plaintiffs before us are abortion providers. They do not claim a constitutional right to perform that procedure, and no one on the Court contends they hold such a right.

Instead, the abortion providers before us seek only to assert the constitutional rights of an undefined, unnamed, indeed unknown, group of women who they hope will be their patients in the future. In narrow circumstances, to be sure, this Court has allowed cases to proceed based on "third-party standing." But to qualify, the plaintiff must demonstrate both that he has a "'close' relationship" with the person whose rights he wishes to assert and that some "'hindrance'" hampers the right-holder's "ability to protect his own interests."... Think of parents and children, guardians and wards. In these special cases, the logic goes, the plaintiff's interests are so aligned with those of a particular right-holder that the litigation will proceed in much the same way as if the right-holder herself were present. Nothing like that exists here.

Democratic Senator Katrina Jackson helped to author the law in 2014, which required abortionists to hold admitting privileges with a hospital within 30 miles of the abortion business. State law requires all ambulatory surgical center physicians and other legitimate healthcare professionals to maintain hospital admitting privileges.

Though the law was created to protect women, after it was signed, the pro-abortion Center for Reproductive Rights, the Hope Medical Group for Women, and two abortionists sued the state of Louisiana to attempt to stop the law from going into effect. A District Court ruled in their favor. However, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the law would stand, and from there it headed to the Supreme Court.

The disappointing decision will allow abortionists in Louisiana to continue to use their victims as a legal shield to continue to operate unchecked. While doctors at all other ambulatory surgical facilities in the state must have admitting privileges at local hospitals, abortionists in the state have avoided this requirement and will continue to do so. Holding abortionists to the same standard as other surgical center physicians would ensure that any woman injured during an abortion would have access to timely and appropriate continuity of care at a local emergency room. Admitting privileges allow an outpatient doctor to alert emergency room staff of the patient's condition before she arrives at the hospital.

Some abortion businesses in Louisiana have admitted that they do not run background checks on the abortionists they hire. Requiring admitting privileges would help to ensure the competency of abortionists, since hospitals review training and experience before allowing doctors to receive admitting privileges. Subscribe for free to Breaking Christian News here







SHARE THIS ARTICLE Printer friendly version of this page

To receive daily emails from Breaking Christian News to your inbox CLICK HERE

Other Recent Articles from Breaking Christian News

Goya CEO: I Am NOT Apologizing for Speaking Positively about Trump

'Where Is the Media?': Catholic Churches Targeted in Weekend of Attacks

'Please Read the Bible,' Tony Dungy Schools Don Lemon after He Alleges Jesus Wasn't Perfect

German Study: Almost No Coronavirus Spread at Schools That Reopened

Florida Medical School Dean: ER Visits Down; Also COVID-19 Affects Some Blood Types More Than Others

Johnny Enlow's Prophetic Word on the '67 Days of God's Face Shining': July 14 - September 19

'He Loved the Lord': Fans Lined the Streets in TN to Honor Country Music Legend Charlie Daniels

'The Church Has Left the Building!': LA Times Declares 'Revival' Happening 'At the Ocean's Edge' in Huntington Beach

Liberty's Jerry Falwell Supports Effort to Rename Lynchburg

Racism Activist Caught Red-Handed Misrepresenting Faith Community: 'It Should Be Illegal to Add the Names of Persons ... to Any Government Document Without First Getting Their Permission'

Morris Cerullo, World-Renowned Evangelist Dies At 88-Years-Old

Turkey Sets Sights on Jerusalem after Converting Hagia Sophia into Mosque

Antibodies: Does Blood Plasma from COVID-19 Survivors Help Patients Infected with Novel Coronavirus?

'It Brought Spirit Back into Her': MD Firefighters Help Reunite Mother, Daughter through Nursing Home Window

Wow! Report Shows the Paycheck Protection Program Saved over 665,000 Ministry Jobs

Pro-life Pregnancy Center Opens Across from Texas Planned Parenthood

Trump Admin Begins Process to Formally Withdraw US from World Health Organization over Apparent Complicity with China's Cover-up of COVID-19

Black Peace Activists Fight Minneapolis City Council Plan to Dismantle Police: 'Utopia' Is Not Possible

Patricia King: 'Build A Firewall of Prayer! Critical Days Require Critical Measures'

Watch This Heart-Stopping Footage: Former Football Player, Marine Catches Toddler Thrown from Burning Building



Search the Articles Archives

Keyword:  
Author:  
Words Posted On:  
Day Month Year



BCN Plus

An BCN Paid Advertisement
An BCN Paid Advertisement
Follow BCN on Twitter
Are You Praying for Our Government Leaders?
BCN Staff

Steve Shultz
Steve Shultz, Managing Editor
Founder and Owner


Aimee Herd
Aimee Herd, Editor


BCN Plus
Are You Praying for President Trump?
 
 
BCN Contact Info

All articles on this site and emails from BCN are copyrighted property of Breaking Christian News. Permission is given to link to, or share a BCN story if proper attribution is given to both the original writer and summarizer of the story. Breaking Christian News 2005-2019. All Rights Reserved.


Breaking Christian News is a division of Elijah List Publications, Inc. All Rights Reserved


Disclaimer: Articles and links, as well as the source articles linked to; do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Breaking Christian News.

editor@breakingchristiannews.com