To receive daily emails from Breaking Christian News to your inbox CLICK HERE
Supreme Court Refuses Case of Christian Florist, Orders Washington Supreme Court to Take a 'Fresh Look'"Barronelle, like Jack, serves all customers but declines to create custom art that expresses messages or celebrates events in conflict with her deeply held religious beliefs," she said. "The Washington attorney general's efforts to punish her because he dislikes her beliefs about marriage are as impermissible as Colorado's attempt to punish Jack."
Instead, the high court is ordering the Washington Supreme Court to take a fresh look at the case. Stutzman has always maintained she was exercising her First Amendment rights when she refused to provide flowers for a gay wedding, explaining it goes against her Christian beliefs. The couple, who had purchased flowers from Stutzman in the past, and state Attorney General Bob Ferguson sued her and won. That ruling was then unanimously upheld by the state's nine supreme court justices. "This case is about crushing dissent. In a free America, people with differing beliefs must have room to coexist," Stutzman's attorney, Kristen Waggoner of the Alliance Defending Freedom, said after the Washington state court's 2017 ruling. "The U.S. Supreme Court has rightfully asked the Washington Supreme Court to reconsider Barronelle's case in light of the Masterpiece Cakeshop decision," Waggoner explained. "In that ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court denounced government hostility toward the religious beliefs about marriage held by creative professionals like Jack and Barronelle. The state of Washington, acting through its attorney general, has shown similar hostility here." "Barronelle, like Jack, serves all customers but declines to create custom art that expresses messages or celebrates events in conflict with her deeply held religious beliefs," she said. "The Washington attorney general's efforts to punish her because he dislikes her beliefs about marriage are as impermissible as Colorado's attempt to punish Jack." This is the second time the Supreme Court has passed on the chance to decide whether business owners can refuse to comply with anti-discrimination laws on religious grounds. The justices also declined to fully address the matter when they ruled in favor of Colorado baker Jack Phillips, who also declined to provide a same-sex wedding cake to a gay couple on the basis of his Christian convictions. In that case, the high court simply ruled on his behalf because the Colorado commission's treatment of Phillips "showed elements of a clear and impermissible hostility toward the sincere religious beliefs motivating his objection." Meanwhile, the Associated Press reports it's unclear whether or not the Washington Supreme Court will view Stutzman's case any differently in light of the Colorado decision.
To receive daily emails from Breaking Christian News to your inbox CLICK HERE
Other Recent Articles from Breaking Christian News Good News: TPUSA High School Clubs More Than Double, Hit 2,700 Nationwide Atheist Bill Maher Condemns Media Silence on Christian Genocide in Nigeria: 'Systematic Killing' As Deadly Violence against Houses of Worship Rises, So Do Law Enforcement, Security Measures Apple Takes Down ICE Tracking Apps After Pressure from Bondi DOJ Kash Patel's FBI Cuts All Ties to Southern Poverty Law Center The President Is Already Using the Shutdown to Slash Federal Spending, Plans to Make Job Cuts Israeli Leaders React to Terror Attack on UK Synagogue as Navy Intercepts Pro-Hamas Flotilla President Trump Sets Sunday Deadline for Hamas to Accept Deal or Face 'ALL HELL' Hamas Says It Will Release All Remaining Hostages, But... 'Blown Away': Hundreds Saved and Baptized as 8,000 Students Seek Jesus at University of Tennessee DOJ Investigates Major School District Over DEI Programs RFK Jr. Directs FDA to Study the Safety of Abortion Pills Planned Parenthood Closes Houston Abortion Facility That Was Biggest in America Democrat Prosecutor Sued after Dropping Charges against Woman Who Violently Assaulted Pro-Lifer Kilmar Abrego Garcia's Final Order of Removal Stands as Judge Denies Motion to Reopen His Case Search the Articles Archives |
All articles on this site and emails from BCN are copyrighted property of Breaking Christian News. Permission is given to link to, or share a BCN story if proper attribution is given to both the original writer and summarizer of the story. Breaking Christian News 2005-2019. All Rights Reserved.
Breaking Christian News is a division of Elijah List Publications, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Disclaimer: Articles and links, as well as the source articles linked to; do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Breaking Christian News.
Home | Store | Subscribe | Facebook | Article Archive |