To receive daily emails from Breaking Christian News to your inbox CLICK HERE


SHARE THIS ARTICLE Printer friendly version of this page

Chilling Denial of Free Speech: Court Decides Student CAN Be Expelled for Calling Gay 'Marriage' a Sin on Facebook

Christian Concern : Oct 31, 2017  Lifesitenews.com

The university argued that they were right to sanction Felix and bar him from his chosen profession in spite of the fact that Felix had lawfully expressed his Christian views as a practicing Christian, outside of his professional studies, in a context in which he was not identified as a social work student, and despite this expression having no impact on his work and professional abilities.

airlift(United Kingdom)—[Christian Concern via LifeSiteNews] A Christian student who was expelled from (a) university after posting on Facebook in support of Biblical teaching on marriage and sexual ethics has lost his case in a judicial review of the university's decision. (Photo: Felix Ngole/Facebook/via LifeSiteNews.com)

Felix Ngole was studying for an MA in Social Work at Sheffield University. In 2015 he made comments using his personal Facebook account on the story of the American registrar Kim Davis who was imprisoned after conscientiously refusing to register same-sex marriages. Felix expressed his Christian beliefs on the issue and argued that: "same sex marriage is a sin whether we like it or not. It is God's words and man's sentiments would not change His words". He was asked where in the Bible it says that same-sex marriage is wrong, and he quoted various passages to demonstrate this.

Nearly two months later, Felix received an email from a university official informing him that his Facebook comments were being investigated. He was later interviewed by an investigatory team, and subsequently removed from his course by a panel chaired by Professor Marsh, an LGBT rights campaigner.

Felix, supported by the Christian Legal Center, sought to challenge the university's decision in a judicial review which was heard in the High Court over two days. The court ruled that the university acted lawfully in removing Felix from his course.

'May have caused offence'
The court heard that the university "investigatory team accepted that Felix was fully entitled to his religious beliefs, and had acted with honesty and integrity." The university held that it was not Felix's views that were at issue, but his public posting of these views. They held that this expression of his views "may have caused offence to some individuals."

The university argued that they were right to sanction Felix and bar him from his chosen profession in spite of the fact that Felix had lawfully expressed his Christian views as a practicing Christian, outside of his professional studies, in a context in which he was not identified as a social work student, and despite this expression having no impact on his work and professional abilities.

'Freedom of speech impaired'
The university and the court agreed that Felix's freedom of speech had been impaired. The judge accepted that his posts "were undoubtedly intended by him to convey a religious perspective." Nevertheless, the court ruled that "Felix had no religious imperative to comment on an American news website about Kim Davis."

The judgment stated: "Freedom of expression is an important right. Exercising that right to express the content of deeply held religious views deserves respect in a democratic and plural society, nowhere more so than in a university. Freedom of religious discourse is a public good of great importance and seriousness."

'No discrimination'
The university agreed that there had been no cause for concern or evidence of Felix acting in a discriminatory fashion, whether on placement or otherwise. The university's decision was not based on speculation that Felix would discriminate in the future either. No discrimination has actually occurred, or is expected to occur in this case.

'Severe sanction'
The judge accepted that the university's sanction of Felix "was indeed severe." The judgment also stated: "Nor is it to doubt that there may well be good grounds to fear more generally for the place of religious discourse, and the understanding of and respect for religious adherents, in the context of a liberal and secular consensus within universities or elsewhere."

The judgment further stated: "If a chain of events, starting with a student posting Bible verses on a news website and ending with him being removed from his course, is one for which the law does not provide him with a remedy, it is important to test hard why not."

'Perceived risk'
What in the end was judged to have justified the university's actions was a perceived risk of damage...

Continue reading here.







SHARE THIS ARTICLE Printer friendly version of this page

To receive daily emails from Breaking Christian News to your inbox CLICK HERE

Other Recent Articles from Breaking Christian News

Dr. Alveda King on MLK Day: Let Freedom Ring for Life

Sen. Tim Scott Creates MLK Day Videos, Hopes to Rebut Biden Speech

Virginia's New Governor Youngkin Off to Quick Start with These Executive Orders, Including Ban on Critical Race Theory

Georgia Bill Would Ban Critical Race Theory, Promote Teaching of America's Founding Principles

GE Suspends Covid Vaccine and Testing Rules after Supreme Court Blocks Biden Mandate

DirecTV Cuts Conservative Network from Its Lineup

Rabbi's Brave Actions Helped TX Synagogue Hostages Escape Islamic Terrorist Captor; His British Sons Detained

Mike Rowe Reveals Why He's Reviving 'Dirty Jobs'—and the Problem He's Seeing Everywhere

'Biden Is Not a King': Pro-Freedom Groups React after Supreme Court Blocks Vaccine Mandate

Australia Cancels Visa of Unvaccinated Tennis Star Novak Djokovic for the Second Time

Judge Sentences Loudon County Sex Offender Teen in School Assaults Case that Enflamed Trans Bathroom Debate

Don't Be Fooled by the Language on Voters' Rights Legislation

Illinois Parents Furious About After School Satan Club in Elementary School

Pro-Life Warrior James Sedlak, Feared by Planned Parenthood, Passes Away at 78

Meet Actor Ray Romano's Brother: The Ex-NYPD Cop Who Embarked on an Investigation to Prove Jesus' Death and Resurrection

Less Than 10% of Evangelicals Want Shorter Sermons; 30% Want More In-Depth Teaching: Survey

'God Has Heard and Answered Our Prayers': Anne Graham Lotz Shares Update after Daughter Suffers Heart Attacks

Watchdog Warns That Biden Admin May Be Creating a Database of Americans Who Asked for Religious Exemption from Vax Mandate

Supreme Court Halts Biden COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate for Businesses

Sen. Sinema Doubles Down on Filibuster Support, Dealing Likely Fatal Blow to Dems' Election Bills



Search the Articles Archives

Keyword:  
Author:  
Words Posted On:  
Day Month Year



BCN Plus

An BCN Paid Advertisement
An BCN Paid Advertisement
An BCN Paid Advertisement
Follow BCN on Twitter
Are You Praying for Our Government Leaders?
BCN Staff

Steve Shultz
Steve Shultz, Managing Editor
Founder and Owner


Aimee Herd
Aimee Herd, Editor


BCN Plus
Are You Praying for President Trump?
 
 

All articles on this site and emails from BCN are copyrighted property of Breaking Christian News. Permission is given to link to, or share a BCN story if proper attribution is given to both the original writer and summarizer of the story. Breaking Christian News 2005-2019. All Rights Reserved.


Breaking Christian News is a division of Elijah List Publications, Inc. All Rights Reserved


Disclaimer: Articles and links, as well as the source articles linked to; do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Breaking Christian News.

editor@breakingchristiannews.com