To receive daily emails from Breaking Christian News to your inbox CLICK HERE


SHARE THIS ARTICLE Printer friendly version of this page

Chilling Denial of Free Speech: Court Decides Student CAN Be Expelled for Calling Gay 'Marriage' a Sin on Facebook

Christian Concern : Oct 31, 2017  Lifesitenews.com

The university argued that they were right to sanction Felix and bar him from his chosen profession in spite of the fact that Felix had lawfully expressed his Christian views as a practicing Christian, outside of his professional studies, in a context in which he was not identified as a social work student, and despite this expression having no impact on his work and professional abilities.

airlift(United Kingdom)—[Christian Concern via LifeSiteNews] A Christian student who was expelled from (a) university after posting on Facebook in support of Biblical teaching on marriage and sexual ethics has lost his case in a judicial review of the university's decision. (Photo: Felix Ngole/Facebook/via LifeSiteNews.com)

Felix Ngole was studying for an MA in Social Work at Sheffield University. In 2015 he made comments using his personal Facebook account on the story of the American registrar Kim Davis who was imprisoned after conscientiously refusing to register same-sex marriages. Felix expressed his Christian beliefs on the issue and argued that: "same sex marriage is a sin whether we like it or not. It is God's words and man's sentiments would not change His words". He was asked where in the Bible it says that same-sex marriage is wrong, and he quoted various passages to demonstrate this.

Nearly two months later, Felix received an email from a university official informing him that his Facebook comments were being investigated. He was later interviewed by an investigatory team, and subsequently removed from his course by a panel chaired by Professor Marsh, an LGBT rights campaigner.

Felix, supported by the Christian Legal Center, sought to challenge the university's decision in a judicial review which was heard in the High Court over two days. The court ruled that the university acted lawfully in removing Felix from his course.

'May have caused offence'
The court heard that the university "investigatory team accepted that Felix was fully entitled to his religious beliefs, and had acted with honesty and integrity." The university held that it was not Felix's views that were at issue, but his public posting of these views. They held that this expression of his views "may have caused offence to some individuals."

The university argued that they were right to sanction Felix and bar him from his chosen profession in spite of the fact that Felix had lawfully expressed his Christian views as a practicing Christian, outside of his professional studies, in a context in which he was not identified as a social work student, and despite this expression having no impact on his work and professional abilities.

'Freedom of speech impaired'
The university and the court agreed that Felix's freedom of speech had been impaired. The judge accepted that his posts "were undoubtedly intended by him to convey a religious perspective." Nevertheless, the court ruled that "Felix had no religious imperative to comment on an American news website about Kim Davis."

The judgment stated: "Freedom of expression is an important right. Exercising that right to express the content of deeply held religious views deserves respect in a democratic and plural society, nowhere more so than in a university. Freedom of religious discourse is a public good of great importance and seriousness."

'No discrimination'
The university agreed that there had been no cause for concern or evidence of Felix acting in a discriminatory fashion, whether on placement or otherwise. The university's decision was not based on speculation that Felix would discriminate in the future either. No discrimination has actually occurred, or is expected to occur in this case.

'Severe sanction'
The judge accepted that the university's sanction of Felix "was indeed severe." The judgment also stated: "Nor is it to doubt that there may well be good grounds to fear more generally for the place of religious discourse, and the understanding of and respect for religious adherents, in the context of a liberal and secular consensus within universities or elsewhere."

The judgment further stated: "If a chain of events, starting with a student posting Bible verses on a news website and ending with him being removed from his course, is one for which the law does not provide him with a remedy, it is important to test hard why not."

'Perceived risk'
What in the end was judged to have justified the university's actions was a perceived risk of damage...

Continue reading here.







SHARE THIS ARTICLE Printer friendly version of this page

To receive daily emails from Breaking Christian News to your inbox CLICK HERE

Other Recent Articles from Breaking Christian News

The US State Department's Outrageous Betrayal of Nigeria's Suffering Christians

Scientist Who Worked Closely With the Wuhan Lab Says COVID Was Genetically Engineered and Leaked

Nonprofit Blood Donation Service Starts Matching Unvaccinated Patients With Donors

Midterm Wins Translate into More Education Victories for Parents

Medical Education Adopts Gender Ideology Cartoons That Dispute Sexual Binary...and SCIENCE

What Democrats Are Trying to Pass before Their House Majority Ends

Elon Musk Releases 'Twitter Files' Confirming Employees Were Censoring for Dems in 2020

Supreme Court Hears Arguments Today on High Stakes Free Speech Case for Christian Web Designer

New Film Tells the True Story behind the Beloved Carol, 'I Heard the Bells on Christmas Day'

Democrats' 'Jim Crow 2.0' Myth Debunked Again as Early Voting in Georgia Runoff Tops 1 Million

Concerns over 87,000 New IRS Agents Mounting after Senator Demanded the IRS Target Conservatives

Balenciaga Photo Fiasco Just Latest Attempt to Mainstream Sexualization of Children

GOP Senators Send Letter Warning That Biden Admin Education Panel, Stacked With Critical Race Theory-Supporting Activists, May Be Breaking the Law

Biden Admin Wants Sex-Change Surgery for Minors to Be Covered by Taxpayer Dollars

Rigorous International Study of N95 Masks Upends Federal COVID Narrative

Latest CDC Data Reveal: the Majority of COVID-19 Deaths Are Vaccinated People

'This is Christ-mas': Actor Tim Allen Pushed Back on Original 'The Santa Clauses' Plot in Quest to Explore Holiday's 'Religious' History

Account Closed: Banks and Businesses Cancel Christians: 'I'd Heard of This Happening to Literally Dozens of Groups'

White House Doublespeak: We Won't Tell Apple to Allow AirDrop in China Because They're Private, That's a Different Situation from Us Vowing to Watch Twitter

South Dakota's Kristi Noem Bans TikTok, Warns of Chinese Intelligence Gathering



Search the Articles Archives

Keyword:  
Author:  
Words Posted On:  
Day Month Year



BCN Plus

Follow BCN on Twitter
Are You Praying for Our Government Leaders?
BCN Staff

Steve Shultz
Steve Shultz, Managing Editor
Founder and Owner


Aimee Herd
Aimee Herd, Editor


BCN Plus
Are You Praying for President Trump?
 
 

All articles on this site and emails from BCN are copyrighted property of Breaking Christian News. Permission is given to link to, or share a BCN story if proper attribution is given to both the original writer and summarizer of the story. Breaking Christian News 2005-2019. All Rights Reserved.


Breaking Christian News is a division of Elijah List Publications, Inc. All Rights Reserved


Disclaimer: Articles and links, as well as the source articles linked to; do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Breaking Christian News.

editor@breakingchristiannews.com