Then imagine that fifth vote no longer even matters because abortion has been declared a human right by international law. The issue is not just out of the hands of the Supreme Court — it is out of the hands of the American people.

This nightmare is now unfolding before our very eyes as the UN Human Rights Committee wraps up a draft legal commentary on the right to life that excludes unborn children from membership in the human family and the protections of international treaties.

The double standard of the Human Rights Committee

The Human Rights Committee is the oldest and most respected of 10 treaty bodies that record the efforts of states to implement UN human rights treaties. It monitors the implementation of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, one of few such treaties ratified by the United States. In July, it published a draft commentary on Article 6 of the treaty on the right to life and invited comments on the draft from civil society and UN member states.

The committee said the right to life "inheres in every human being" and "should not be interpreted narrowly." It called the right to life the "most precious" right, the "supreme right from which no derogation is permitted." It even made a highly inclusive list of those protected under Article 6 "without distinction of any kind, such as race, color, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth, or any other status, including caste, sexual orientation and gender identity, disability albinism and age."

The committee then proceeded to exclude unborn children from the protection of Article 6.

States parties must provide safe access to abortion to protect the life and health of pregnant women, and in situations when carrying a pregnancy to term would cause a woman substantial pain or suffering, most notably when the pregnancy is the result of rape or incest, or when the fetus suffers from fatal impairment. (Photo Credit: Pixabay)

And it excluded also the terminally ill.

States parties [may allow] [should not prevent] medical professionals to provide medical treatment or the medical means in order to facilitate the termination of life of [catastrophically] afflicted adults, such as the mortally wounded or terminally ill, who experience severe physical or mental pain and suffering and wish to die with dignity.
The brackets indicate lack of agreement within the committee on the final formulation.

Leaving aside the entirely laughable attempt to sanction euthanasia on the basis of international law, the mental gymnastics involved here are remarkable. The committee had to ignore the text of Article 6 itself, which prohibits the application of the death penalty to pregnant women. The committee had to also blindfold itself to the Convention on the Rights of the Child; this is the most widely ratified UN human right treaty, cited extensively by the committee in other matters, which expressly states that children are already protected by international law "before birth."

The committee disingenuously applied a double standard in interpreting the history of the negotiations of the treaty, as Thomas Finegan demonstrates in an important article, "International Human Rights Law and the "Unborn": Texts and Travaux Préparatories," in the Winter 2016 issue of the Tulane Journal of International & Comparative Law. It is true that a 1957 draft of the Covenant—the final version of which was ratified in 1966 — removed a positive obligation to protect children in the womb from the moment of conception. But Finnegan found no indication in the negotiations that this language was omitted because the right to life was not understood to apply to children in the womb. Rather, it should be viewed as a necessary compromise that allowed countries with permissive abortion regimes to ratify the treaty.

Not only does the final version of Article 6 prohibit the application of the death penalty to pregnant women, throughout the decades-long process of negotiations preceding its ratification, several delegates argued that the right to life applied to children in the womb. Not a single delegate denied that the unborn child has a right to life. In 1947, during the earliest stages of drafting the Covenant, a positive obligation to permit abortion in cases of rape, fetal disability, or for therapeutic reasons was explicitly rejected. Even that rejected proposal did not exclude children in the womb from the protections of the Covenant, but rather carved out a derogation from the right to life in limited circumstances.

Finegan concludes that the omission of the proposal in 1957 should be interpreted not as excluding unborn children from the protections of international law, but as merely leaving a margin of appreciation to domestic legislation on the issue of abortion.

Rights by stealth

Unfortunately, the Human Rights Committee does not subscribe to textualism or consider original intent in its interpretation of international treaties. Most committee members, and the UN bureaucrats who service the committees, are realists who believe human rights treaties are living instruments. And the committee is not alone. (Photo Credit: Human Rights Committee)

No UN treaty mentions abortion, and no UN treaty can be fairly interpreted as recognizing a right to abortion. In fact, international law has a presumption in favor of protecting life in the womb, as the San Jose Articles, which were signed by over thirty experts in international law, explain. UN member states continue to say in UN resolutions that abortion is an issue to be dealt with exclusively in national legislation.

Yet nearly all treaty bodies have fallen prey to an elaborate scheme, first documented by my colleague Susan Yoshihara, to establish a de facto international right to abortion by reading abortion into every possible human rights treaty with the help of abortion groups and the UN bureaucracy. Their output on the matter is prodigious, with hundreds of recommendations to countries to liberalize or decriminalize abortion…

Click here to continue reading, and to find out what you can do.

To receive daily emails from Breaking Christian News to your inbox CLICK HERE

'Repent Tents' and 10-Foot Cross to Be Placed at Tennessee Capitol for Non-Stop Prayer: 'Desperation for God'

'Digital Abomination': Transhumanism, the Creepy New AI Religion and the Globalist Agenda for Your Future

Speaker Pleads Ignorance after Leading Zelensky and Trudeau in Tribute to Nazi SS Soldier

She Wanted to Be a Man From a Young Age and Lived as One for 11 Years: Why Kathy Grace Duncan Detransitioned

Canada's Conservative Party Leader Speaks Out in Favor of Parental Rights, Slams Trudeau for Condemning Million Person March

Report: Baltimore Public School System Producing Little to No Students Proficient in Math

Border Bypass: Biden Admin Lets 221K+ Migrants Fly Directly into the US

Disgusting: Biden Admin Set to Deport German Homeschool Family, While Millions of Illegals Invade America

'God Is Moving': Baptist Church in Kentucky Celebrates 100 Salvations, 46 Water Baptisms

Pro-Life Community in Israel Convenes First National Prayer Gathering to Stop Abortion

Senator Graham to Newsmax: Biden's Venezuelan Work Permits Will Bring 'Another Million' Illegals to US

Democrat US Senator Indicted on Federal Bribery Charges

[Watch] US Rep. Spartz' Fiery Questioning of AG Garland: 'Are You Aware That Americans Are Afraid of Being Persecuted By Their Own Government?'

'Wrong Side of History': Jordan Peterson Slams Trudeau for Condemning Canada's 1 Million March for Kids

Praise The Lord! Alabama's Governor Vows to Fight Jesus-Hating Atheists after Auburn Lawsuit Threats

'God Never Gives Up on You': Max Lucado Reveals He Fought a Secret Battle with Alcohol

Manitoba Churches File Appeal against COVID-Era Worship Restrictions With Supreme Court

Warning from a Mom: 'Don't Let Your Child Fall Prey to a Manufactured Identity Crisis'

Best Buy Employee Allegedly Fired for Voicing Concerns over LGBT 'Training' Videos

Project Veritas Ceases Operations, Lays Off All Remaining Journalists