To receive daily emails from Breaking Christian News to your inbox CLICK HERE


SHARE THIS ARTICLE Printer friendly version of this page

"Significant" Freedom of Speech Victory for NYC Crisis Pregnancy Centers through Settlement

Erik Zimmerman : Apr 7, 2016  ACLJ.org

As a result of this lawsuit, our clients and other crisis pregnancy centers in New York City are able to continue to offer their assistance to women and lifesaving care without being hampered by a lengthy series of oppressive pro-abortion speech mandates.

[ACLJ.org] Countless pro-life crisis pregnancy centers across the country offer free counseling, goods, services, and referrals to pregnant women in need of assistance. They provide a vital alternative to the abortion industry that views women as potential sources of profit (to the tune of millions of dollars every year) and their unborn children as potential sources of organs to be harvested intact and shipped off to researchers. (Photo via LifeSiteNews)

The abortion industry and its allies are well aware of the threat to its bottom line posed by crisis pregnancy centers and, as such, these centers are targeted at times by oppressive legislation. Five years ago, the ACLJ filed a lawsuit—Evergreen Association, Inc. v. City of New York—on behalf of two organizations that run about half of the pro-life crisis pregnancy centers in New York City to challenge one such law. This anti-free speech law was one of the first of its kind in the country—a law that the abortion lobby used as an example, pressuring other cities and states to impose similar anti-life mandates.

After a long fought legal battle, a settlement agreement that represents an important win in defense of our clients' freedom of speech rights was recently finalized and approved by the court.

In March 2011, the City enacted a draconian law aimed at shutting down pro-life crisis pregnancy centers by hijacking their right to speak for themselves. The law required facilities defined to be "pregnancy services centers" to provide a lengthy series of five disclaimers, in English and Spanish, in any advertisements, in multiple signs at the facility, and at the outset of any in-person or phone conversations with members of the public. Failing to become the City's mouthpiece in this manner would subject centers to crippling fines and penalties.

If the law was permitted to take effect, it would have stifled the ability of pro-life centers to advertise their services—offered free of charge to women facing difficult situations—which is just what its pro-abortion supporters wanted.

Our lawsuit argued that the law violated our clients' freedom of speech. The Supreme Court of the United States has long recognized that the First Amendment's protection of the freedom of speech "prohibits the government from telling people what they must say." The government has plenty of ability to speak for itself—for instance, through public service campaigns, monuments, and the like—but it crosses the line when it attempts to force citizens to involuntarily become government mouthpieces.

We filed a motion for preliminary injunction, asking the district court judge to prevent the law from taking effect, and the court granted the motion, which allowed our clients to continue to speak freely while the case moved forward. The court noted that the law significantly burdened our clients' ability to speak freely, and was not the least restrictive way of promoting the City's interests.

The City appealed this decision to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. In January 2014, the court held that four of the five disclaimer requirements were likely unconstitutional, while one was likely constitutional. We filed a certiorari petition with the Supreme Court concerning the lone requirement that the Second Circuit upheld, which was eventually denied.

After many subsequent months of discussions and negotiations, the lawsuit was recently settled based on an agreement reached with the City. The settlement tracks the Second Circuit's decision with respect to the five disclaimer mandates: the City is permanently enjoined from enforcing the four disclaimer requirements that the Second Circuit held were likely unconstitutional, while it may enforce the one disclaimer requirement upheld by the Second Circuit against facilities that meet the definition of "pregnancy services center."

We hope that the settlement will bring litigation between our clients and the City of New York to an end once and for all. However, the settlement leaves the door open for future litigation to protect our clients' ability to freely exercise their fundamental rights should the need arise.

For instance, the settlement preserves our clients' right to challenge the administrative rules that supplement the law if they are materially changed in the future. Additionally, the settlement preserves our pro-life clients' right to bring a future suit in the event that the City's enforcement of the law or the administrative rules, as applied to our clients, violates their constitutional rights.

Importantly, the settlement also states that the City "shall not rely upon Plaintiffs' viewpoint regarding abortion or emergency contraception" in determining whether their facilities are regulated "pregnancy services centers" unless doing so satisfies the rigorous strict scrutiny standard for viewpoint discrimination (which it certainly would not).

As a result of this lawsuit, our clients and other crisis pregnancy centers in New York City are able to continue to offer their assistance to women and lifesaving care without being hampered by a lengthy series of oppressive pro-abortion speech mandates. The fight continues across the country, however, as we continue to litigate another case on behalf of several California pro-life centers faced with a similar (and in some ways worse) anti-pro-life speech law.

We will continue to defend the rights of crisis pregnancy centers and their dedicated staffs against those who seek to shut them down. 

We will never give up the fight to ensure that these crisis pregnancy centers continue to help women in need and defend unborn babies—one life at a time.

Reprinted with permission from ACLJ.org.







SHARE THIS ARTICLE Printer friendly version of this page

To receive daily emails from Breaking Christian News to your inbox CLICK HERE

Other Recent Articles from Breaking Christian News

Irish Citizens Could Go to Prison for Just Shopping in Israel if This New Anti-Israel Law is Passed

Los Angeles Bans Travel to Alabama, Calling Pro-Life Law an "Act of Aggression"

FACT CHECK: Ilhan Omar Is Spreading a Big Lie About Recently Passed Pro-Life Heartbeat Bills

Put Down the Starbucks! This Coffee Co. Alternative Supports LIFE, and Also Helps Single Moms

Tearful Theresa May Resigns after Brexit Failure: "No Ill Will"

"Wall of Answered Prayer" to Make "Good News Contagious" in UK: Will Celebrate Christian Heritage and Inspire Nation to Pray

"Lost Tomb" of Famed Warrior King Robert the Bruce Interred in Ancient Scottish Church

HEALTH: Civil War Era Plant Medicines Blast Drug-Resistant Bacteria

President Trump and First Lady Visit Arlington Cemetery to Pay Their Respects to America's Fallen Soldiers

Local Business Keeps Flying Giant American Flag Despite $11k in Fines from North Carolina City Gov; and Their Petition is Growing

Navy's Famous Top Gun School 50th Anniversary: Founder Says God was His "Co-Pilot" While Creating Training Program; "I Prayed for the Gift of Discernment"

New York Times Reports "Religious Conservative" Wives are the Happiest: Social Media Completely Loses It

FBI Presents Award to Baptist Church for Fighting against Human Trafficking

Millennial Evangelicals More Likely To Attend Church Weekly Than Older Generations, Poll Finds

Catastrophic Tornado Devastates Capital of Missouri, Leaves at Least 3 Dead: More Tornadoes, Flooding Expected

5 Surprising, Diverse Public Figures Speak Out against the 'Equality Act': "We're Talking about Civil TYRANNY, Not Civil Rights"

"They're ridiculous": Rep. Jim Jordan Says Democrats Are Plotting a 'Coordinated Effort' to Try to Take Down President Trump

Americans "Outraged" That Taliban Sympathizer and Traitor John Walker Lindh to be Released Early From Prison

US Ambassador to Israel Compares President Trump and President Morales of Guatemala to "Joshua and Caleb"

"Deal of the Century" for Mid-East Peace to Be Unveiled in Bahrain



Search the Articles Archives

Keyword:  
Author:  
Words Posted On:  
Day Month Year



To Order by Phone Call: 1-866-354-5245 (1-541-926-3250 outside the U.S.)

BCN Plus

An BCN Paid Advertisement

An BCN Paid Advertisement
BCN Store
Follow BCN on Twitter
Are You Praying for Our Government Leaders?
BCN Staff

Steve Shultz
Steve Shultz, Managing Editor
Founder and Owner


Aimee Herd
Aimee Herd, Editor


Teresa Neumann
Teresa Neumann, Reporter

BCN Plus
Are You Praying for President Trump?
 
An ElijahList Paid Advertisement
 
BCN Contact Info

All articles on this site and emails from BCN are copyrighted property of Breaking Christian News. Permission is given to link to, or share a BCN story if proper attribution is given to both the original writer and summarizer of the story. Breaking Christian News 2005-2017. All Rights Reserved.


Breaking Christian News is a division of Elijah List Publications, Inc. All Rights Reserved


Disclaimer: Articles and links, as well as the source articles linked to; do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Breaking Christian News.

541-924-3906