In an extraordinary Order issued [this week], the Court directs the parties to file supplemental briefs that specifically address how the contraceptive and abortifacient coverage mandated by the Obama Administration might still be obtained by religious objectors' employees in a way that would not involve the objectors in any way in the process—including submitting the form that is required under the current HHS Mandate and is at the center of the current controversy.
 
Not only does the Court direct the parties to submit supplemental briefs no later than April 12th, the Court provides a detailed example of a procedure in which the Little Sisters' moral dilemma would be addressed in a way that (the Court suggests) might be morally acceptable to the Sisters while, at the same time, achieving the government's stated goal of removing barriers to contraceptive access. The Order does not present the parties with a "take it or leave it" example; instead, the Court invites the parties to come up with "other proposals along similar lines."
 
This is an extraordinary and hopeful development. While most observers of last Wednesday's oral argument on the case walked away believing that the Court was split 4-4—a result that would have meant a loss for the Little Sisters and others who lost at the courts of appeal—[This week's] development appears to indicate that the Court is, instead, struggling to fashion a resolution of the case that both sides can live with. Perhaps, in hindsight, there were hints of unease among even some of the liberal members of the Court last week when they were visibly surprised by what appeared to be the government's acknowledgment that the HHS Mandate did, in fact, impose a "substantial burden" on religious liberty. (Screengrab via Little Sisters of the Poor/YouTube)

Such an acknowledgment (later denied, somewhat weakly, by the government's lawyer) would trigger an obligation by the government to pursue its objectives by means that would be the "least restrictive" upon the Sisters' religious liberty. What today's Order suggests, if nothing else, is that there may be a majority of the Court that, in pondering the implications of this case, is grappling with the realization that there are, in fact, less restrictive means available to the government, one of which is outlined in today's Order itself.
 
All in all, we are pleased to see that the Court is viewing the religious liberty claims at stake here with the utmost seriousness and is taking this extraordinary step of directing the parties to help it craft a resolution that will truly respect and preserve our First Freedom.

Reprinted with permission from ACLJ.org.

To receive daily emails from Breaking Christian News to your inbox CLICK HERE

Faith of a Founding Father: George Washington's Christian Beliefs

Nashville Charter Schools Agree to Remove Same-Sex Marriage Books from Elementary Curriculum

Project Watershed 250 is Launched to Shield US Water from Cyberattacks

President Trump Summons Oil Executives to White House in Push to Slash Gas Prices

192 House Democrats Vote No on Anti-Socialism Measure

Trump and Rubio's Bold Venezuela Oil Pact Could Finally Crush Communism's Grip

Economic Squeeze Could Bring Down Iran's Islamic Regime (Video)

Spencer Pratt Slams Warped 'Compassion' for 'Baby Killers' but Not Their Victims

Judge Greenlights Death Penalty Trial for Charlie Kirk's Accused Killer

'A Total God Thing': ICU Nurses Go Above and Beyond to Fulfill Dying Woman's Final Wish

As Iran Spirals Deeper into Crisis, the Church There Stands Strong: 'People Are Drawn to the Lord'

Victor Davis Hanson's Warning: The Radical Left Wants to Destroy America (Video)

New York Democrat Governor Wears Muslim Hijab 2 Weeks Before 9/11 25th Anniversary

Feds Arrest 95 Illegal Alien Truck Drivers in Arizona

Senate Candidate Talarico's Manipulative, Deceptive, Pandering Photo Posts Exposed with the Truth by DHS

Florida Government Orders Removal of ALL Flock Cameras on State Roads

Supreme Court Allows White House Ballroom Construction in 5-4 Ruling; Roberts Sides with Liberal Justices

Ancient Burial Cave Discovered Beneath Jerusalem Opens Window into Time of Jesus

New Data Analysis Shows 5 Million Jobs Will Be Lost with DSA's Hike of Minimum Wage to $25

New Study Proposes Creation of Data Rights Associations to Counteract AI Abuses