To receive daily emails from Breaking Christian News to your inbox CLICK HERE


SHARE THIS ARTICLE Printer friendly version of this page

Supreme Court: Border Officers Can Suspend Criminal Illegals' Permanent Status

Craig Bannister : Jun 24, 2026  MRC Newsbusters

"Because border officers would not know the evidence against the alien, imposing that requirement was just a way of dismantling the protections in the law against a whole class of alien criminals. We are pleased the Court refused to go along with this gutting of the law, and reversed." -Christopher J. Hajec, deputy general counsel of the Federation for American Immigration Reform

[Newsbusters.org] Border officers can suspend a foreign national's status as a permanent lawful US resident, pending resolution of a criminal charge, the Supreme Court ruled Tuesday. (Image: Pexels)

In a 6-3 decision in the case of Blanche v. Lau, the Supreme Court sided with Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, reversing and remanding a Second Circuit appeals court ruling in favor of Muk Choi Lau, a Chinese national seeking to remain in the US after pleading guilty to a felony.

Lau became a lawful permanent US resident in 2007. But, after he was charged with third-degree trademark counterfeiting in New Jersey in 2012, he left the country.

A lawful permanent resident who arrives in the US after a temporary absence can usually reenter the US at will because he has previously been deemed admitted—unless he has committed serious crimes involving "moral turpitude."

In Lau's case, when he tried to reenter the US, a border officer noticed on a FBI database that Lau had been indicted for a felony. As a result, the border officer granted Lau temporary admittance ("parole")—not admittance as a lawful permanent resident—pending the outcome of his criminal trial.

Ultimately, Lau pleaded guilty to counterfeiting, prompting the US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to secure a removal order for his deportation. Lau lost an appeal to the Board of Immigration, then sued. The Second Circuit ruled in his favor on the grounds that the border officer did not have "clear and convincing" evidence Lau had committed a serious crime.

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court disagreed:

"Held: The Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) does not require a border officer to have clear and convincing evidence that a lawful permanent resident has committed a crime involving moral turpitude before deeming the resident an applicant for admission."

"We decline to read into the INA an additional clear-and-convincing-evidence burden on border officers entrusted with making 'quick judgments on the spot' when that burden is nowhere in the statute," Justice Clarence Thomas wrote in the majority opinion.

If a legal permanent resident returning from abroad has committed a qualifying offence, such as a serious crime, that person "can be divested of his already-admitted status and treated as if he is 'seeking an admission'" by a border officer, Thomas explained.

The ruling enables border officers who know that a permanent legal resident seeking reentry has been charged with a felony criminal offense to modify that foreign national's status and issue a notice to appear for immigration status resolution once the court case is settled.

The Supreme Court did not decide whether Lau's crime was one meeting the "moral turpitude" requirement to revoke his permanent status. Instead, it sent the case back to the Second Circuit for further proceedings.

Indictment, instead of "clear and convincing evidence," is considered sufficient, since prosecutors are only allowed to seek and file charges if they believe they have enough proof to convince a jury of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

"Congress never intended to saddle customs officers at airports with finding 'clear and convincing evidence' that an alien charged with a crime actually committed it," Christopher J. Hajec, deputy general counsel of the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR), said in a statement applauding the Supreme Court's decision:

"Because border officers would not know the evidence against the alien, imposing that requirement was just a way of dismantling the protections in the law against a whole class of alien criminals. We are pleased the Court refused to go along with this gutting of the law, and reversed."

FAIR had previously filed a brief with the Supreme Court arguing for what would prove to be the High Court's ruling in Tuesday's opinion. Subscribe for free to Breaking Christian News here







SHARE THIS ARTICLE Printer friendly version of this page

To receive daily emails from Breaking Christian News to your inbox CLICK HERE

Other Recent Articles from Breaking Christian News

US Missionary Freed from 9 Months in Captivity After White House Prioritized His Rescue

Trump Effect: Prescription Drug Prices Fall At Record-Breaking Pace

Dem Senate Nominee and Muslim El-Sayed in the Hot Seat after 'Sickening' Animal Control Record Goes Viral on Social Media

A 7-Year-Old Boy's Preventable Death Demands an End to Polite Silence

Mom Sues School that Retaliated Against Her for Objecting When It Subjected Her Kids to Trans/Intersex Propaganda

WNBA Embarrasses Itself with Absurd Embrace of Everything It Isn't

Hospitals 'Got Rich' and Were 'Mutilating' Children; Vance, HHS Officials Announce Report

Dutch Sheets, Lou Engle Rally Believers for Breakthrough in Iran: 'Pivotal Moment in History'

Podcaster Robby Starbuck Gets a Win against Google AI Chatbot's Horrendous Defamation, and Gives Us All a Warning

Miracle as Mother Trapped for 36 Hours Underneath Rubble from Colombia Earthquake Is Pulled Out Alive

Extreme Irony: Ex-Southern Poverty Law Center CFO Charged In Brazen Scheme to Secretly Pay $1.2M to White Supremacist Groups

Secret Service Switched Trump's Plane Over Iranian Threat

Karoline Leavitt Raised the Bar for All White House Press Secretaries to Come

Karoline Leavitt to Depart as White House Press Secretary So She Can 'Be the Best Mom My Two Young Children Deserve' (Video Interview)

Georgia Court Reinstates School Bible Program

'Golden Age of Solar Eclipses' Kicks into Gear: 3 Total Eclipses and 3 'Rings of Fire' in 3 Years

A Rare Kremlin Concession: Former Marine Freed after Years of Captivity

How Public Officials Are Stepping In to Protect a Baby Boy with a Heart Condition, and What This Viral Surrogacy Case is All About

Democrat Socialists Suffer Setback in Wisconsin, Darline Graham Advances in SC Special Election

'Safer Than It's Been in Decades': FBI Touts 6,000 Arrests, 44% Homicide Drop One Year into Trump's DC Crime Crackdown (Video)



Search the Articles Archives

Keyword:  
Author:  
Words Posted On:  
Day Month Year



Subscribe to
Breaking Christian News


Follow BCN on Twitter
Are You Praying for Our Government Leaders?
BCN Staff

Steve Shultz
Steve Shultz, Managing Editor
Founder and Owner


Aimee Herd
Aimee Herd, Editor


BCN Plus
Are You Praying for President Trump?
 
 

All articles on this site and emails from BCN are copyrighted property of Breaking Christian News. Permission is given to link to, or share a BCN story if proper attribution is given to both the original writer and summarizer of the story. Breaking Christian News 2005-2019. All Rights Reserved.


Breaking Christian News is a division of Elijah List Publications, Inc. All Rights Reserved


Disclaimer: Articles and links, as well as the source articles linked to; do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Breaking Christian News.

editor@breakingchristiannews.com