To receive daily emails from Breaking Christian News to your inbox CLICK HERE


SHARE THIS ARTICLE Printer friendly version of this page

Four Key Cases the US Supreme Court Will Look at in 2025-2026 Term

S.A. McCarthy : Aug 13, 2025  The Washington Stand

...In Chiles v. Salazar, Christian counselor Kaley Chiles is challenging a Colorado law banning "conversion therapy," citing religious liberty violations. The law prohibits counselors and therapists from cautioning children against gender ideology and gender transition procedures but allows counselors and therapists to encourage gender ideology and gender transition procedures...

[WashingtonStand.com] Over the past year, the US Supreme Court has made several significant decisions and rulings, from protecting children from online pornography, allowing parents to opt their children out of LGBT promotion in the classroom, and empowering states to defund Planned Parenthood to halting the abuse of universal injunctionsending workplace reverse discrimination, and letting states shield children from harmful gender transition procedures. The Supreme Court's emergency docket was also filled—and often—with the nation's highest judicial authority frequently siding with President Donald Trump on everything from immigration to transgender-identifying military servicemembers. (Screengrab image: via US Supreme Court)

The Supreme Court's next term, beginning in October, promises to keep the nine justices just as active. Here are some of the most important cases already on the Supreme Court's docket for the next year.

Little v. Hecox

In United States v. Skrmetti, decided earlier this year, the Supreme Court determined that states are free to protect children from transgenderism; now, the court will decide whether states are free to protect women's sports. In 2020, Idaho approved H.B. 500, a law barring biological males who identify as women from competing in women's sports. Lindsey Hecox, a biological male who identifies as a woman, challenged the law in an effort to compete on Boise State University's track and cross-country women's teams. The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit determined that Idaho's law violated the Equal Protection Clause and was, therefore, unconstitutional.

"Women and girls have fought for decades to achieve an equal playing field. Nowhere has that been more evident than in sports," Idaho wrote in its appeal to the Supreme Court. The appeal continued, "The last decade has exhibited a growing trend of males identifying as females competing against—and beating—females in women's sports across the country." Idaho pleaded, "This Court's review is urgently needed to resolve [jurisprudential] splits and preserve the equal playing field women have fought to secure. ... Every day the Ninth Circuit's decision stands, female athletes suffer injustice. The petition should be granted without delay."

West Virginia v. BPJ

Idaho specifically requested that the Supreme Court also take up the similar case of West Virginia v. BPJ, in order to firmly resolve questions surrounding the legal definitions of sex and gender and their treatment before the law. In response to a West Virginia law blocking biological males from competing in women's sports, transgender-identifying 12-year-old Becky Pepper-Jackson (the eponymous BPJ) filed a lawsuit, citing violations of the Fourteenth Amendment, the Equal Protection Clause, and Title IX. Clinton-appointed Judge Joseph R. Goodwin of the US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia originally prevented the state from enforcing the law but ultimately ruled that it was not unconstitutional. Last year, the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit disagreed, writing that applying the law to BPJ "would treat her worse than people to whom she is similarly situated, deprive her of any meaningful athletic opportunities, and do so on the basis of sex."

In its petition to the Supreme Court, West Virginia wrote, "This Court should set things right. The Fourth Circuit's splintered decision casts into doubt similar laws in at least 24 other States, sows confusion about antidiscrimination law, ignores scientific evidence, and renders school sports an un-administrable morass." The state continued, "In the end, the decision all but declares that any law recognizing differences between sexes is unlawful whenever that law runs counter to someone's 'gender identity.'"

Chiles v. Salazar

Idaho and West Virginia aren't the only states tackling the issue of transgenderism. Colorado has also waded into the fray, but heading the other direction. In Chiles v. Salazar, Christian counselor Kaley Chiles is challenging a Colorado law banning "conversion therapy," citing religious liberty violations. The law prohibits counselors and therapists from cautioning children against gender ideology and gender transition procedures but allows counselors and therapists to encourage gender ideology and gender transition procedures. Both a US District Court and the US Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit previously ruled against Chiles, allowing the Colorado law to stand.

The Ninth and Tenth Circuit Courts currently classify conversations between counselors and patients as "conduct," which states are permitted to legally regulate, while the Third and Eleventh Circuit Courts recognize those conversations as constitutionally-protected free speech. "The Court should not allow this conflict to persist. Otherwise, counselors like Kaley Chiles and countless other professionals ... will have First Amendment protections in some states but not others," wrote Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) attorneys representing Chiles. "Constitutional rights should not depend on geographical happenstance," ADF attorneys wrote. They added, "This Court's review is urgently needed to reaffirm that the government cannot censor messages 'under the guise' of regulating conduct..."

First Choice Women's Resource Centers, Inc. v. Platkin

New Jersey's Attorney General, Democrat Matthew Platkin, subpoenaed First Choice Women's Resource Centers, a group of pro-life pregnancy resource centers, demanding information on donors and doctors affiliated with the group. Platkin claimed to be investigating potentially misleading business practices, but First Choice Women's Resource Centers claimed in a federal lawsuit that the AG's actions had a "chilling effect" on pro-lifers' First Amendment rights to freedom of speech and freedom of association.

Both a US District Court and the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit dismissed the lawsuit, ruling that it properly belonged in a state court, not a federal court. While the Supreme Court isn't expected to resolve the First Amendment claims, the justices will address the jurisdictional question, clarifying federal court jurisdiction over state actions infringing on First Amendment rights. Subscribe for free to Breaking Christian News here

S.A. McCarthy serves as a news writer at The Washington Stand.







SHARE THIS ARTICLE Printer friendly version of this page

To receive daily emails from Breaking Christian News to your inbox CLICK HERE

Other Recent Articles from Breaking Christian News

Remembering 'A Charlie Brown Thanksgiving'

Exposed: Soros Family Has Been Working With the US State Department for 50 Years, Wikileaks Shows

Bishops Vote to Prohibit Trans Surgeries and Hormone Treatment in Catholic Hospitals

Do No Harm Survey Shows Rank-and-File Doctors Oppose DEI in Healthcare

Federal Report Exposes Sacramento's Failure: AAP, AMA, WPATH Lied and Lawmakers Let Children Pay the Price

FBI's Patel and Bongino Share Details of Op that Stopped Huge Halloween Islamic Terror Plot: 'A Lot of People Would've Died'

President Trump Designates Muslim Brotherhood as a Foreign Terrorist Organization

Same Old Tricks: Big Tech News 'Aggregators' Suppress Dem Scandals in Lead-Up to Elections

Maryland School Board Resists State’s Attempt to Override Removal of Explicit LGBT Book

All Living Israeli Hostages Now Home, Embraced by Medical Staff and Loving Communities, Yet Facing Long Recovery

Chicago public schools blow millions on travel expenses while students can't read at grade level

'That doesn't exist': Doge reportedly quietly disbanded ahead of schedule

Trump to Propose Framework to Lower Healthcare Costs

How Algorithms Are Targeting Our Young Boys

Thanks to the Woke Math Movement, Some Freshmen at UCSD Can’t Do Grade-Level Math

Israel Charges Hamas Rearming, Stockpiling Weapons Abroad as White House Welcomes Israeli Hostages

Blue State Somalis Allegedly Sent Welfare Money To Al-Qaeda Ally Planning Another 9/11

DOJ Arrests US Citizens and Chinese Nationals for Exporting AI Tech to China

US Marshals Help Rescue 122 Missing Children Calling It 'Largest Rescue Mission in History'

Dead Sea Scrolls Exhibit at Museum of the Bible Invites Nonbelievers to Witness 'Power' of Biblical Texts



Search the Articles Archives

Keyword:  
Author:  
Words Posted On:  
Day Month Year



BCN Plus

Follow BCN on Twitter
Are You Praying for Our Government Leaders?
BCN Staff

Steve Shultz
Steve Shultz, Managing Editor
Founder and Owner


Aimee Herd
Aimee Herd, Editor


BCN Plus
Are You Praying for President Trump?
 
 

All articles on this site and emails from BCN are copyrighted property of Breaking Christian News. Permission is given to link to, or share a BCN story if proper attribution is given to both the original writer and summarizer of the story. Breaking Christian News 2005-2019. All Rights Reserved.


Breaking Christian News is a division of Elijah List Publications, Inc. All Rights Reserved


Disclaimer: Articles and links, as well as the source articles linked to; do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Breaking Christian News.

editor@breakingchristiannews.com