To receive daily emails from Breaking Christian News to your inbox CLICK HERE


SHARE THIS ARTICLE Printer friendly version of this page

US Supreme Court Won't Force Texas Hospitals to Intentionally Kill Preborn Babies in Emergencies

Laura Nicole : Oct 8, 2024  Live Action News

"...Every state allows doctors to do whatever is necessary to preserve the life of a mother. But elective abortion is not life-saving care—it ends the life of the unborn child—and the government has no authority to force doctors to perform these dangerous procedures. We are pleased that the Supreme Court decided the 5th Circuit's ruling should stand, allowing emergency rooms to fulfill their primary function—saving lives." -Alliance Defending Freedom Senior Counsel Matt Bowman to Life News

[LiveAction.org] The Supreme Court declined on Monday to hear the Biden administration's appeal of a case in which it would force Texas hospitals to commit abortions as emergency stabilizing "treatment," leaving a lower court's decision in place. (Image: Pixabay)

After the 2022 Dobbs decision that overturned Roe v. Wade, the Biden administration's department of Health and Human Services (HHS) invoked the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) to issue federal guidance in July of the same year. EMTALA is a law that requires hospitals to treat emergency medical conditions and stabilize patients, such that their conditions will likely not deteriorate in the immediate future.

The Biden administration took that guidance a step further, directing that hospitals had to provide "emergency" abortions, preempting any state pro-life law—or risk losing federal funds.

Texas sued the Biden administration, saying among other things that the rule was improperly applied, that it violates the Hyde amendment by making federal funding dependent on providing abortions, and that nothing in EMTALA supports an abortion mandate. "EMTALA does not mandate access to abortion or codify a right to an abortion as 'stabilizing treatment' for an 'emergency medical condition.' The Abortion Mandate cites no other federal law that would authorize or require an abortion. No federal statute, including EMTALA, supersedes or preempts the States' power to regulate or prohibit abortion," read the suit in part.

READ: A growing number of Americans call themselves 'pro-choice' – but what's really behind it?

The Supreme Court's move leaves in place the earlier 5th Circuit Court of Appeals decision in Texas' favor, stating that "EMTALA does not govern the practice of medicine." However, the questions of the case remain unresolved at the national level. 

Separately, Idaho also sued the administration. As Live Action News reported in that case:

...the US Supreme Court sent Moyle v. United States and Idaho v. United States back to a lower court, reinstating an injunction on Idaho's Defense of Life Act. This means that should an "emergency abortion" become absolutely necessary to protect a pregnant woman in any of the very narrow possible circumstances where Idaho's law conflicts with the federal EMTALA rules, doctors in Idaho must provide that "emergency abortion" as a "stabilizing treatment." A press release quote from Idaho AG Raúl Labrador noted:

The Biden administration's concession that EMTALA will rarely override Idaho's law caused the Supreme Court to ask the 9th Circuit for review in light of the federal government's change in position. Justice Barrett wrote, those concessions mean that Idaho's Defense of Life Act 'remains almost entirely intact.' The 9th Circuit's decision should be easy. As Justice Alito explained well: the Biden administration's 'preemption theory is plainly unsound.'

Abortion, defined as the intentional and direct killing of a preborn child, is not health care and is not medically necessary, despite the efforts of the media to portray instances of insufficient medical care as the direct consequence of pro-life laws. Subscribe for free to Breaking Christian News here

When a mother's life is in danger, it is not necessary to kill her baby before performing a labor induction or an emergency c-section in an effort to save both lives, or to remove an ectopic pregnancy. Additionally, all of these procedures are legal under Texas' heartbeat law, which contains a legal carve-out for medical emergencies







SHARE THIS ARTICLE Printer friendly version of this page

To receive daily emails from Breaking Christian News to your inbox CLICK HERE

Other Recent Articles from Breaking Christian News

Why the New RomCom ‘MERV’ Can Bring You Joy This Christmas

How the 'Heavens Declare the Glory of God': What One Man's Research Has Revealed about The Star of Bethlehem

Over 50 Tren de Aragua Gang Members Imported Under Democrats Indicted in Nebraska in Massive Nationwide ATM Jackpotting Scheme

205 Child Victims Located and Rescued in DOJ Sex Exploitation Op

Trump Admin Pausing All Off Shore Wind Project Construction Due To National Security Concerns

Trump Grants Federal Workers Two Additional Christmas Holidays

America Fest 2025: Erika Kirk Endorses 'My Husband's Friend' JD Vance for President

Brent Bozell Confirmed as US Ambassador to South Africa

Jury Quickly Convicts Judge Who Helped Illegal Migrant Escape ICE

Feds Estimate Somali-Linked Fraud in Walz's Minnesota Could Top $9 Billion

Trump SUSPENDS 'Green Card Lottery' after Program Let Brown University–MIT Shooting Suspect Enter the US

Brown, MIT Shooter Found Dead for Days in NH Storage Unit; Motive Still a Mystery

House Passes Bill to Criminalize Transgender Mutilation of Children

November Inflation Falls to 2.7%, Lower than Expected: 'This Is Good News for Wall Street; It’s Good News for Main Street'

MOVIEGUIDE's Review of the New Animated Film: DAVID

Massachusetts Drops Controversial Gender Ideology Mandate for Licensing Foster Care Parents

Nearly 40% of Women Suffer Severe Grief for Years after Abortion, Miscarriage: Study

Former Pfizer Vice President: COVID Shots Were 'Designed to Cause Injury,' Reduce Fertility

Dutch Sheets Shares a Warning from the US National Counterterrorism Center

Venezuela: Trump's Pressure Campaign and Maduro's Fury



Search the Articles Archives

Keyword:  
Author:  
Words Posted On:  
Day Month Year



BCN Plus

Follow BCN on Twitter
Are You Praying for Our Government Leaders?
BCN Staff

Steve Shultz
Steve Shultz, Managing Editor
Founder and Owner


Aimee Herd
Aimee Herd, Editor


BCN Plus
Are You Praying for President Trump?
 
 

All articles on this site and emails from BCN are copyrighted property of Breaking Christian News. Permission is given to link to, or share a BCN story if proper attribution is given to both the original writer and summarizer of the story. Breaking Christian News 2005-2019. All Rights Reserved.


Breaking Christian News is a division of Elijah List Publications, Inc. All Rights Reserved


Disclaimer: Articles and links, as well as the source articles linked to; do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Breaking Christian News.

editor@breakingchristiannews.com