To receive daily emails from Breaking Christian News to your inbox CLICK HERE


SHARE THIS ARTICLE Printer friendly version of this page

New California Bill Enables Activists to Sue Pro-Life Pregnancy Centers and Churches into Silence

News Staff : Feb 7, 2023  California Family Council

"This bill seeks to suffocate government-despised-prolife-speech by forcing crisis pregnancy clinics into a quagmire of litigation. Politicians and pro-abortion lobbyists now threaten to drown these clinics by fines and expensive legal battles." -Kevin Snider, chief counsel for the Pacific Justice Institute

(Sacramento, CA) – [CaliforniaFamily.org] California's pro-abortion legislators are making good on their promise to go after the state's pro-life pregnancy care centers for alleged "misinformation." Last week, Assemblywoman Rebecca Bauer-Kahan (D-Livermore) introduced AB 315, a bill enabling pro-abortion activists to sue pro-life pregnancy centers for speech they consider "false or misleading." But the bill language is so expansive that any pro-life ministry or church that offers women "health counseling service related to pregnancy" could be affected. (Screengrab image: via PregnancyCareCenter.com)

According to Bauer-Kahan, this bill is necessary to stop pro-life pregnancy centers from "lying to pregnant people about abortion." She also believes these clinics pretend to be abortion clinics to lure unsuspecting women looking for an abortion. But the bill language does not define what information would be considered "misleading" or "false" or how someone would know which opinions about abortion or pregnancy are allowed. According to legal experts, that vague language is by design in order to facilitate debilitating lawsuits.

"This bill seeks to suffocate government-despised-prolife-speech by forcing crisis pregnancy clinics into a quagmire of litigation," said Kevin Snider, chief counsel for the Pacific Justice Institute. "Politicians and pro-abortion lobbyists now threaten to drown these clinics by fines and expensive legal battles."

Denise Burke, Senior Counsel for Alliance Defending Freedom, agrees. This "bill would allow activists to mercilessly target pro-life pregnancy centers, all because these life-saving centers don't support the state's extreme pro-abortion agenda. These centers could be sued by abortion activists who claim that factually true statements about abortion's maternal health risks are 'misleading' or 'false' information.'"

The text of the bill states, "A person doing business in California who is performing, has performed, or intends to perform a pregnancy-related service shall not advertise using a false or misleading statement related to the person's provision, or lack of provision, of abortion."

To understand the full meaning of this sentence, the bill defines the terms. A person doing a "pregnancy-related service," is defined as someone offering "a medical or health counseling service related to pregnancy or pregnancy prevention." So that would include a pro-life pregnancy care center, but also could include someone providing sidewalk counseling or handing out pro-life resources outside an abortion clinic, or a church ministry that provides pregnancy-related counseling services to abortion-vulnerable women.

Advertising is defined as offering or providing "goods or services to the public, regardless of whether or not the goods or services are offered for payment or result in a profit." In light of these two definitions, if any organization or person that provides a good or service, even if for free, related to pregnancy can be sued by someone who believes they were given false or misleading information about abortion.

Since the bill is "enforceable by a private right of action" that means anyone can sue to enforce this law with fines starting at $1000.

Snider did take comfort that federal courts in recent years have "struck down California laws restricting First Amendment liberties, finding that free speech requires 'breathing space' in a free society."

Just last month a federal judge blocked the enforcement of a California law passed last year, AB 2098, that punishes medical professionals for giving "misinformation" about COVID-19 to their patients. Senior Judge William Shubb said the bill's definition of "misinformation" was "unconstitutionally vague," citing the 14th Amendment's due process clause. The bill's definition of "misinformation" reads, "false information contradicted by contemporary scientific consensus contrary to the standard of care." Shubb called the bill's definition "nonsense" and said that it was "grammatically incoherent."

"The statute provides no clarity on the term's meaning, leaving open multiple important questions," the judge's order said.

"Pregnancy centers are here to provide free services for women's medical, material, and emotional needs, while abortion businesses prey on their desperation and try to convince them that abortion is their only option—all for profit," Burke explained. "Pro-life pregnancy centers should be able to continue caring for mothers and their babies without government-endorsed retribution." Subscribe for free to Breaking Christian News here







SHARE THIS ARTICLE Printer friendly version of this page

To receive daily emails from Breaking Christian News to your inbox CLICK HERE

Other Recent Articles from Breaking Christian News

Supreme Court Rules for Pro-Life Centers: 'The Government Has No Business Harassing Pro-Life Ministries'

President Trump Signs Executive Order Expanding High-Quality Retirement Accounts for Millions of Americans (VIDEO)

Worldwide Implications of the UAE's OPEC Exit

Democrat Activist Texas Judge Rules State Agency Must Greenlight 400-Acre Islamic City Near Dallas

New Footage of Trump Assassination Attempt Released. Here's What It Shows [Video]

MAHA Victory on Capitol Hill as GOP Agrees to Drop Special Pesticide Protections

DOJ Report Reveals Biden Admin's Expansive Religious Liberty Violations and Hostility to American Christians

SPLC's Indictment Prompts Loss of Donations from Vanguard, Fidelity Charitable Programs

President Trump Signs Bill to Fund DHS, Ending the Democrat Shutdown

Evidence Young People Are Turning to Christianity Isn’t Anecdotal; It’s Real

100 Missionaries Deploy to 10/40 Window amid Increasing Reports of Visions of 'The Man in White'

WATCH: Millionaire Tax Critic Says AGO, Dems Played Politics Instead of Protecting Residents

Total Victory: Florida Congressional Maps Are Now Official

Trump, Hegseth Praise US Performance in Iran as Congress Pushes Back; Israel Appalled at London Attack on Jews

Ex-Muslim Flees Iran, Says Jesus Appeared in Dreams to Family Members

May Day Protests are Coming. Urgent Prayers Needed!

Anthony Fauci's Former Senior Adviser Indicted for Role in COVID Cover-up

King Charles III Gifts President a Bell from Hms Trump at White House State Dinner Reinforcing US-UK Bonds

Feds Raid More Than 20 Sites in Minneapolis Fraud Probe

This is a Spiritual Battle over America; Take Your Place Praising God, Our Worship is Warfare!



Search the Articles Archives

Keyword:  
Author:  
Words Posted On:  
Day Month Year



Subscribe to
Breaking Christian News


Follow BCN on Twitter
Are You Praying for Our Government Leaders?
BCN Staff

Steve Shultz
Steve Shultz, Managing Editor
Founder and Owner


Aimee Herd
Aimee Herd, Editor


BCN Plus
Are You Praying for President Trump?
 
 

All articles on this site and emails from BCN are copyrighted property of Breaking Christian News. Permission is given to link to, or share a BCN story if proper attribution is given to both the original writer and summarizer of the story. Breaking Christian News 2005-2019. All Rights Reserved.


Breaking Christian News is a division of Elijah List Publications, Inc. All Rights Reserved


Disclaimer: Articles and links, as well as the source articles linked to; do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Breaking Christian News.

editor@breakingchristiannews.com