To receive daily emails from Breaking Christian News to your inbox CLICK HERE
Thomas More Society Attorneys Drop Bombshell Evidence in Biden DOJ's Prosecution of Pro-Life Dad"This new evidence shows clearly that Congress intended to limit the FACE Act to patients and staff working in the clinic, and not to take sides between pro-life and pro-choice counselors and escorts on the sidewalk..." -Thomas More Society Executive Vice President & Head of Litigation Peter Breen (Philadelphia, PA) — [ThomasMoreSociety.org] Lawyers for Mark Houck, a pro-life father of seven being prosecuted by the Biden administration, dropped bombshell evidence in defense of the pro-life advocate at a January 17, 2023, pretrial hearing in Philadelphia. Thomas More Society attorneys produced new evidence—never before considered by a federal court—that when the United States Congress passed the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act, it expressly intended to exclude so-called "escorts" operating outside of abortion facilities from being encompassed by the FACE Act. (Screengrab image: Mark Houck) The Thomas More Society filing on behalf of Houck in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, quotes Senator Ted Kennedy (D-MA), chief sponsor of the FACE Act. Kennedy clearly stated that clinic escorts are excluded, because they do not provide reproductive health services in a facility, as required under the FACE Act. "The FACE Act was never intended to cover disputes between advocates on the public sidewalks outside of our nation's abortion clinics," declared Thomas More Society Executive Vice President & Head of Litigation Peter Breen, who is representing Houck. "This new evidence shows clearly that Congress intended to limit the FACE Act to patients and staff working in the clinic, and not to take sides between pro-life and pro-choice counselors and escorts on the sidewalk. The Biden Department of Justice's prosecution of Mark Houck is pure harassment, meant solely to intimidate our nation's pro-life sidewalk counselors who provide vital resources to help pregnant women at risk for abortion." The Thomas More Society filing highlights a key exchange between Kennedy and Senator David Durenberger (R-MN), over a bipartisan amendment they negotiated to strip clinic escorts of the right to bring lawsuits under the FACE Act (139 Cong. Rec. S15682): Mr. DURENBERGER. By defining "aggrieved person" in this way, was it your intention to exclude clinic escorts or so-called clinic defenders? Mr. KENNEDY. That is correct. Demonstrators, clinic defenders, escorts, and other persons not involved in obtaining or providing services in the facility may not bring such a cause of action. Durenberger then reiterated that escorts are not covered under the FACE Act (139 Cong. Rec. S15686): The bill, as currently drafted before us, allows legal relief only to clinic patients and personnel. And this is the critical, if you will—not the only, but the critical—change that has been agreed to by the proponents of this legislation and by the Senator from Massachusetts. We have recognized that Federal law should be extended narrowly to protect only those who were actually attempting to obtain or provide medical or counseling services. It does not protect the escorts. Thomas More Society attorneys filed the Objections to Government's Jury Instructions in response to the Biden Department of Justice's proposed jury instructions, which claim that, under the FACE Act, "A provider of reproductive health services includes any staff member or volunteer escort who is an integral part of a business where reproductive health services are provided." The Biden Department of Justice claims that volunteer abortion escort Bruce Love is a "provider of reproductive health services" under the FACE Act. Thomas More Society attorneys have provided alternate jury instructions, arguing that the clear language of the FACE Act requires that the reproductive health services must be provided "in a...facility," which excludes escorts—a view reinforced by the clear statements supplied by the Congressional record. United States of America v. Mark Houck is currently set for a jury trial, January 24 through 27, 2023, before United States District Judge Gerald J. Pappert in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Subscribe for free to Breaking Christian News here Read the Objections to Government's Jury Instructions, filed on January 17, 2023, by Thomas More Society attorneys on behalf of Mark Houck, in United States of America v. Mark Houck, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, here.
To receive daily emails from Breaking Christian News to your inbox CLICK HERE Other Recent Articles from Breaking Christian News West Virginia Student Helps Pass Bill to Teach Intelligent Design: 'This Is a God-Fearing State' Free Speech Resolution Allows Satanic Temple 'Invocation' Sparking Chaos at a Michigan Board Meeting Paris Olympics Will Feature a 'Pride House' to 'Celebrate' Homosexual and Gender-Confused Athletes Video Captures Drag Queen Indoctrinating Kids, Getting Them to Chant... 'Free Palestine' Who's Funding the Anti-Israel, Pro-Palestine Protests? DEVELOPING: Harvey Weinstein Rape Conviction Overturned By New York Appellate Court Supreme Court Puts Final Nail in Coffin of Effort to Block Trump from Ballot in Arizona Courageous: Worship Leader Sean Feucht Prepares to Confront Anti-Israel Evil, Darkness, and Horror New Emails Expose Biden's Connection to Whistleblower Who Got Trump Impeached Tennessee Passes Bill Letting Teachers Carry Guns at Schools Transgender Movement Is Losing Its Influence on Social Media to Shut Down Debate Ohio Attorney General Breaks Down Leftist Legal 'Trick' to Block GOP Efforts to Protect Kids Nearly 2,000 Minnesota Students, 15 Teachers Walk Out of LGBTQ 'Indoctrination' Lesson 'Just a Disaster': Biden's Title IX Rule Empowers LGBTQ Movement, Erases Women and Justice United For Israel March Happening on the Columbia University Campus, April 25th Search the Articles Archives |
All articles on this site and emails from BCN are copyrighted property of Breaking Christian News. Permission is given to link to, or share a BCN story if proper attribution is given to both the original writer and summarizer of the story. Breaking Christian News 2005-2019. All Rights Reserved.
Breaking Christian News is a division of Elijah List Publications, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Disclaimer: Articles and links, as well as the source articles linked to; do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Breaking Christian News.
Home | Store | Subscribe | Facebook | Article Archive |