Still, it was a day for Phillips, his family and supporters to celebrate.

"We're very excited about the 7-2 decision for Jack Phillips," said Michael Farris, head of the Alliance Defending Freedom, which defended the baker in court. "The court has given him a permanent win."

Big Victory for Religious Liberty

"This is a big win for all Americans, including Americans who believe that marriage is the union of husband and wife, because it's a big win for everyone's religious liberty," Ryan Anderson of the Heritage Foundation declared.

"The court said 7-2 that the states can't show hostility towards religious Believers, including traditional religious Believers like Jack Phillips," he said.

ADF lawyer Kristin Waggoner represented Phillips, who's been fighting this for six years and lost half his business over it.

"It has been a long process, but Jack is very relieved to know that he will not have to choose between his convictions and his family business because that is a price no one should have to pay," Waggoner stated.

"Colorado Went Too Far"

Phillips, who had previously served gays without incident, refused to bake and decorate one special cake to celebrate a same-sex marriage. The couple who wanted the cake sued, and Colorado, came down on Phillips like a ton of bricks, even attacking him personally.

The justices suggested that's its own kind of intolerance and that the Colorado Civil Rights Commission made the mistake of not protecting the rights of Phillips.

"They (the justices) said the state of Colorado repeatedly disparaged his beliefs, disparaged his religious convictions, used analogies to racists and Nazis in order to show hostility towards Mr. Phillips, and the Constitution does not allow that," Anderson said.

Mat Staver, Founder of the Liberty Counsel, agreed, saying, "Colorado went too far."

"They denigrated the religious faith of Jack Phillips regarding marriage," he told CBN News. "And what the justice said when he was reading the decision is that the First Amendment requires tolerance of a person's faith."

The Supreme Court Chastised Itself

Republican Oklahoma Sen. James Lankford explained, "Where government stepped in and said, 'You have to set aside your beliefs to fit into government's beliefs,' the Supreme Court pushed back on that and said, 'No, your beliefs matter just like the beliefs of any individual within government.'"

"In fact, the Supreme Court chastised itself and said, 'Hey, we don't set the conscience for the nation here. Individuals do,'" he added.

Regent School of Law Dean Michael Hernandez stated, "The clear message is to the civil rights commissions out in the country: 'Do not treat Christians with contempt. Do not treat them differently than you do others that bring their perspectives into the public arena.'" (Photo: US Supreme Court/Creative Commons/Pixabay)

Staver noted, "This really focused on the Colorado Civil Rights Commission making negative comments about Jack Phillips pertaining to marriage. And they never backed away from that, all the way to United States Supreme Court."

Not All Religious People Were on Phillips' Side

Plenty of gay rights supporters expressed their displeasure outside the high court, with some saying they resent this being described as a religious rights case.

"As Jews and as people of faith we know this isn't an issue of the Religious Right versus the Secular Left. It certainly shouldn't be," said Arielle Gingold of the group Bend the Arc Jewish Action.

"And we know this is not the true meaning of religious freedom," Gingold continued. "And as a Jew, as a person of faith, I take personally any attempt to use that religion to discriminate against others."

Rev. Jennifer Butler, CEO of the group Faith in Public Life, told CBN News she's disappointed by the court's decision.

She suggested the ruling "allows some businesses in some circumstances to discriminate in the name of religion. And as a pastor and as a mom, I'm appalled that anyone would discriminate in the name of my precious faith."

The court decided the case on narrow grounds, though.

Rachel Laser, a lawyer and head of Americans United for Separation of Church and State, told CBN News, "Today's decision is very narrow. It's only based on a ruling that the Colorado Civil Rights Commission was biased in its own findings. And the court did re-affirm that businesses that are open have to be open to all."

That means this era of prosecuting religious Believers, who might do something like Phillips did, could continue.

Farris said, "A step has been taken in the right direction for them, but we've got a long way to go yet."

"We're going to have to see how the Supreme Court now applies this 7-2 ruling to some of the other cases percolating—cases involving a florist, a photographer, another set of bakers," said the Heritage Foundation's Anderson.

"Disagreement Is Not Discrimination"

Sen. Lankford, however, wasn't sure he agreed with the analysis that this is a narrow ruling.

"I'm not sure I see it that way yet," he told CBN News. "They were laying down a foundation to say government should be religion-neutral. Over and over and over again, they came back to that."

And that led Anderson to suggest wording for the next court ruling involving conscientious objectors to serving same-sex marriages should read as follows.

"What it should say is disagreement is not discrimination," Anderson said. "We can disagree about gay marriage without hauling each other into court; without the states punishing people for simply acting on their belief that marriage unites husband and wife."

Your Religious Rights Extend Way beyond the Church

Farris noted that this was a day to celebrate what's been won.

"The court said 'religious people, religious business owners, have their rights as well, and tolerance is a two-way street,'" he said.

Folks these days do seem to agree that Believers have the freedom to worship. But Believers explain that a truly rich and meaningful spiritual life has to extend way beyond the boundaries of just what you do in church. They declare it has to permeate every part of your life, including your business. With Monday's 7-2 ruling, the justices seem to agree with that point.

"The activists on the Left want to say that when you enter the marketplace, you have to leave behind your faith," Anderson explained. "But as Justice Neil Gorsuch points out in his concurrence, as Justice Clarence Thomas points out in his concurrence, the Supreme Court has never said that."

"The Supreme Court has said that our free speech rights and our free exercise religious rights—they apply at home, in a church or a synagogue or a mosque and in the workplace," he said.

To receive daily emails from Breaking Christian News to your inbox CLICK HERE

Good News: TPUSA High School Clubs More Than Double, Hit 2,700 Nationwide

Atheist Bill Maher Condemns Media Silence on Christian Genocide in Nigeria: 'Systematic Killing'

'We Found Him': The Alleged Smoke Bomber Who Disrupted a Sean Feucht Worship Event; His Shocking Links to Antifa Inside Canada's Military

As Deadly Violence against Houses of Worship Rises, So Do Law Enforcement, Security Measures

Portland Police Arrest Conservative Journalist Nick Sortor Outside ICE Facility, 'But None of the Domestic Terrorists'

Apple Takes Down ICE Tracking Apps After Pressure from Bondi DOJ

Kash Patel's FBI Cuts All Ties to Southern Poverty Law Center

The President Is Already Using the Shutdown to Slash Federal Spending, Plans to Make Job Cuts

Israeli Leaders React to Terror Attack on UK Synagogue as Navy Intercepts Pro-Hamas Flotilla

President Trump Sets Sunday Deadline for Hamas to Accept Deal or Face 'ALL HELL'

Hamas Says It Will Release All Remaining Hostages, But...

'Blown Away': Hundreds Saved and Baptized as 8,000 Students Seek Jesus at University of Tennessee

Concerned Citizens Checked Their 'Conservative' Town High School Library for These Obscene Books Available to Students; Here's What Happened

DOJ Investigates Major School District Over DEI Programs

RFK Jr. Directs FDA to Study the Safety of Abortion Pills

Planned Parenthood Closes Houston Abortion Facility That Was Biggest in America

Democrat Prosecutor Sued after Dropping Charges against Woman Who Violently Assaulted Pro-Lifer

Kilmar Abrego Garcia's Final Order of Removal Stands as Judge Denies Motion to Reopen His Case

Gov't Shutdown Continues: White House Releases New Memo Exposing Dems' Demand for Nearly $200 B in Taxpayer-Funded Healthcare for Illegal Immigrants

Watch: Faith Revival Follows Charlie Kirk's Death As More People Attend Church and Read the Bible; 'This Is Bigger Than Charlie Kirk'