To receive daily emails from Breaking Christian News to your inbox CLICK HERE
Justice Department Insists the Government Can Dictate Where People Can Engage in Religious Activity"Unfortunately, free speech zones, bubble zones, trespass zones, anti-bullying legislation, zero tolerance policies, hate crime laws, overly vague noise ordinances, and a host of other legalistic maladies dreamed up by politicians and prosecutors have conspired to corrode our core freedoms." — John W. Whitehead
In May 2016, the Supreme Court upheld its own ban on expressive activity in Hodge. Payden-Travers v. Talkin takes up where Hodge left off, challenging the Court's broader prohibitions on expressive activity, especially as they relate to religious expression. Rutherford Institute attorneys argue the plaza prohibition violates the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, which says the government must have a compelling interest in order to intrude on someone's religious liberty, and it must do so in the least restrictive way. The Rutherford Institute's complaint in Payden-Travers v. Talkin and the Dept. of Justice's motion to dismiss are available at www.rutherford.org. Affiliate attorney Jeffrey Light is assisting The Rutherford Institute in its challenge to the Supreme Court's prohibitions of expressive activity on its plaza.
The plaza area in front of the Supreme Court is oval in shape and approximately 252 feet in length, is open 24-hours a day and is no different than other traditional public fora such as parks and sidewalks. The plaza has historically been used for First Amendment activities, including press conferences, tourists conversations, and filming of scenes for movies. Nevertheless, a 60-year-old statute broadly made it unlawful to display any flag, banner, or device designed to bring into public notice a party, organization, or movement while on the grounds of the U.S. Supreme Court, thereby banning expressive activity on the Supreme Court plaza. In January 2012, The Rutherford Institute filed a lawsuit, Hodge v. Talkin, on behalf of a political activist who was charged with violating the statute by silently standing on the plaza with a sign protesting police brutality. In June 2013, U.S. District Court Judge Beryl L. Howell ruled that the statute was unconstitutionally overbroad, facially unconstitutional and void. Just two days after this ruling, the Supreme Court adopted Regulation 7, which attempts to reinstate the restrictions struck down by Judge Howell by banning any "demonstration" on the Supreme Court grounds, which is broadly defined by Regulation 7 to include all forms of conduct communicating views or grievances that might draw onlookers. Rutherford Institute
To receive daily emails from Breaking Christian News to your inbox CLICK HERE
Other Recent Articles from Breaking Christian News Good News: TPUSA High School Clubs More Than Double, Hit 2,700 Nationwide Atheist Bill Maher Condemns Media Silence on Christian Genocide in Nigeria: 'Systematic Killing' As Deadly Violence against Houses of Worship Rises, So Do Law Enforcement, Security Measures Apple Takes Down ICE Tracking Apps After Pressure from Bondi DOJ Kash Patel's FBI Cuts All Ties to Southern Poverty Law Center The President Is Already Using the Shutdown to Slash Federal Spending, Plans to Make Job Cuts Israeli Leaders React to Terror Attack on UK Synagogue as Navy Intercepts Pro-Hamas Flotilla President Trump Sets Sunday Deadline for Hamas to Accept Deal or Face 'ALL HELL' 'Blown Away': Hundreds Saved and Baptized as 8,000 Students Seek Jesus at University of Tennessee DOJ Investigates Major School District Over DEI Programs RFK Jr. Directs FDA to Study the Safety of Abortion Pills Planned Parenthood Closes Houston Abortion Facility That Was Biggest in America Democrat Prosecutor Sued after Dropping Charges against Woman Who Violently Assaulted Pro-Lifer Kilmar Abrego Garcia's Final Order of Removal Stands as Judge Denies Motion to Reopen His Case Israel's PM Just Blew Up All Those Conspiracy Theories About Charlie Kirk Being Anti-Semitic Search the Articles Archives |
All articles on this site and emails from BCN are copyrighted property of Breaking Christian News. Permission is given to link to, or share a BCN story if proper attribution is given to both the original writer and summarizer of the story. Breaking Christian News 2005-2019. All Rights Reserved.
Breaking Christian News is a division of Elijah List Publications, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Disclaimer: Articles and links, as well as the source articles linked to; do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Breaking Christian News.
Home | Store | Subscribe | Facebook | Article Archive |