Before Justice Antonin Scalia's untimely death, it was widely recognized that on many issues, including abortion, the Court had been divided 4-4 with Justice Anthony Kennedy often providing the deciding vote. Replacing Scalia with a justice holding an opposite perspective would typically lead to either 5-4 or 6-3 rulings on such issues.

Euthanasia could be among them.

As brief background, nearly every state across the country has long had a law protecting against assisting another in a suicide. There has been on ongoing attempt by pro-euthanasia advocates in the U.S., as a first step, to carve out an exemption that says your doctor can give you a lethal prescription to take home and overdose on if you meet several scant legal requirements.

The primary organization behind these efforts is Compassion and Choices, or C&C (formerly the Hemlock Society). While those at C&C are seeking to legalize much broader euthanasia, it has made a strategic decision to begin with this thin-edge-of-the wedge approach.

Currently, doctor-prescribed suicide is legal in Oregon, Washington and Vermont, and it may have some legal immunity in Montana, due to a court decision. Doctors can start writing lethal prescriptions in June in California.

The 2016 election season will have decades-long ramifications on what direction the Supreme Court takes this country. The issue of assisting suicide could come before the High Court.

It is critical to realize that the word "court" has become largely a misnomer. While the Supreme Court does indeed exercise judicial functions in a number of cases with low-ideological content—settling contract and patent issues, for example—when it comes to making "constitutional" rulings the body has gradually come to act more and more like a "Supreme Legislature."

Whereas in past decades, presidential candidates often eschewed so-called litmus tests for how their appointees would vote on specific issues, instead talking generally about "judicial philosophy," today those in both parties talk openly about a laundry list of positions anyone they'd nominate would have to take.

For example, it is clear as daylight that if the Scalia vacancy is filled by a President Obama, Clinton or Sanders, there will be five votes on the nine-member body to strike down essentially all limits on or regulations of abortion, ranging from the Hyde Amendment through informed consent and parental involvement laws to the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg contends that any law touching abortion differently than, say, prostate surgery invalidly constitutes "sex discrimination."

For a summary of expected changes from a self-described "liberal" constitutional law professor, Erwin Cherminsky, see here.

Less widely discussed is that the issue of assisting suicide will almost inevitably again come before the High Court. Few may remember the justices did address the issue almost 20 years ago.

In 1997, the U.S. Supreme Court in the case of Washington v. Glucksberg, unanimously rejected the claim that there was a constitutional "right" to assist suicide. But many of the concurring Justices suggested they agreed only because there was not yet enough evidence to show that states could not rationally fear abuses.

Moreover, in one concurring opinion in Glucksberg, then-Justice John Paul Stevens made a point of saying that he did not intend to "foreclose the possibility that an individual plaintiff seeking to hasten her death, or a doctor whose assistance was sought, could prevail in a more particularized challenge."

In addition to this open-ended invitation to bring a case in the future, Supreme Court Justices have also indicated that they like to look at trends.

In the 2005 Roper v. Simmons case (an unrelated juvenile death penalty case), the Court wrote, "It is not so much the number of ... States [changing their laws] that is significant, but the consistency of the direction of the change." Despite their misleading nature, official reports from California, Oregon and other states where euthanasia is legal could in the future be cited to assert that fear of abuses has become irrational. The Justices could conclude they would no longer allows states the constitutional latitude to prevent assisting suicide.

So while you might not live in one of the states where doctor-prescribed suicide is legal, if more states join the ranks of California, Oregon, Washington and Vermont—and above all if 2016 sees the election of a president and Senate likely to use the next Supreme Court vacancy to nominate and confirm a Justice sympathetic to euthanasia—there is the real risk the U.S. Supreme Court might well follow the Supreme Court of Canada recent decision holding there is a federal constitutional right to assist suicide.

The Carter v. Canada decision did not limit itself to those said to be "terminally ill." It mandated legalized assisting suicide for anyone who...

Click here to continue reading.

To receive daily emails from Breaking Christian News to your inbox CLICK HERE

Atheists Triggered by Billy Graham Statue in the US Capitol

Israel Pursues 'Critical' Rafah Battle, Defends against Legal Attack as Gaza Aid Pier Nears Completion

More Shady Biden Accounts Have Been Discovered

House Judiciary Votes to Hold AG Merrick Garland in Contempt of Congress

Fed Court: Parents in Maryland School District CANNOT Opt K-5 Children Out of LGBTQ Curriculum

Teacher Wins $360,000 Settlement after Being Fired for Refusing to Use Preferred Pronouns Because of Her Faith: 'Justice Is Served'

NFL Star Harrison Butker's Brave Commencement Speech Triggers the Left, Causing Them to Petition for Him to Be Fired; Others Call Him 'Hero'

UK Waking Up? Government to End Sex Education for Children Under Nine, and Teach That 'Gender Ideology' is Contested

'For Love of Country': Tulsi Gabbard Is Free from the Democrat Party She No Longer Recognizes

Soros-Linked DC Judge Releases Teen Gunman after He Sprayed Dozens of Shots at a Car

Kansas City Chiefs Kicker Slams Biden for Supporting Abortion in College Commencement Speech

Persecution of Pro-Life Americans Continues With This Week's Sentences in DC FACE Act Case

Senator Paul to Newsmax: Scientist Affirms Gain-of-Function in Wuhan, 'This Is a Really Big Deal'

White House Asserts 'Executive Privilege' over Biden's Interview with Robert Hur, Blocking the Tapes from Congress

'God Was With Us': Pastor Touts Miracle after Terrifying Moment F1 Tornado Rips Off Church's Roof during Worship Service

Canada's Intelligence Agency Classifies Opponents of LGBT Gender Ideology as a 'Violent Threat'

Argentina's Javier Milei Is Proving the Leftists Wrong With Latest Economic News

As Memorial, Independence Days End, Israel's Attention Turns to Rafah, Hezbollah Battlefronts

New Biden Rule Aims to Entrench the Deep State Forever

Bombshell Report: George Soros Fueled $80M in Attempt to 'Silence Americans' Using Big Tech Censorship in Lead-Up to 2024 Elections