To receive daily emails from Breaking Christian News to your inbox CLICK HERE


SHARE THIS ARTICLE Printer friendly version of this page

Supreme Court Sends Hopeful Signal In Little Sisters Religious Liberty Case

Francis J. Manion : Apr 1, 2016  ACLJ.org

This is an extraordinary and hopeful development. While most observers of last Wednesday's oral argument on the case walked away believing that the Court was split 4-4—a result that would have meant a loss for the Little Sisters and others who lost at the courts of appeal—today's development appears to indicate that the Court is, instead, struggling to fashion a resolution of the case that both sides can live with.

[ACLJ.org] In the most closely watched religious liberty case of its current term, the U.S. Supreme Court today dropped a major hint that it might not be content to let the passing of Justice Antonin Scalia result in a 4 - 4 deadlock that would force the Little Sisters of the Poor and other religious entities to choose between violating their consciences and closing up shop. (Screengrab via Little Sisters of the Poor/YouTube)

In an extraordinary Order issued [this week], the Court directs the parties to file supplemental briefs that specifically address how the contraceptive and abortifacient coverage mandated by the Obama Administration might still be obtained by religious objectors' employees in a way that would not involve the objectors in any way in the process—including submitting the form that is required under the current HHS Mandate and is at the center of the current controversy.
 
Not only does the Court direct the parties to submit supplemental briefs no later than April 12th, the Court provides a detailed example of a procedure in which the Little Sisters' moral dilemma would be addressed in a way that (the Court suggests) might be morally acceptable to the Sisters while, at the same time, achieving the government's stated goal of removing barriers to contraceptive access. The Order does not present the parties with a "take it or leave it" example; instead, the Court invites the parties to come up with "other proposals along similar lines."
 
This is an extraordinary and hopeful development. While most observers of last Wednesday's oral argument on the case walked away believing that the Court was split 4-4—a result that would have meant a loss for the Little Sisters and others who lost at the courts of appeal—[This week's] development appears to indicate that the Court is, instead, struggling to fashion a resolution of the case that both sides can live with. Perhaps, in hindsight, there were hints of unease among even some of the liberal members of the Court last week when they were visibly surprised by what appeared to be the government's acknowledgment that the HHS Mandate did, in fact, impose a "substantial burden" on religious liberty. (Screengrab via Little Sisters of the Poor/YouTube)

Such an acknowledgment (later denied, somewhat weakly, by the government's lawyer) would trigger an obligation by the government to pursue its objectives by means that would be the "least restrictive" upon the Sisters' religious liberty. What today's Order suggests, if nothing else, is that there may be a majority of the Court that, in pondering the implications of this case, is grappling with the realization that there are, in fact, less restrictive means available to the government, one of which is outlined in today's Order itself.
 
All in all, we are pleased to see that the Court is viewing the religious liberty claims at stake here with the utmost seriousness and is taking this extraordinary step of directing the parties to help it craft a resolution that will truly respect and preserve our First Freedom.

Reprinted with permission from ACLJ.org.







SHARE THIS ARTICLE Printer friendly version of this page

To receive daily emails from Breaking Christian News to your inbox CLICK HERE

Other Recent Articles from Breaking Christian News

'The Chosen' Added to Netflix and Immediately Soars in Popularity as one of the 'Most Liked' Titles

Hawaii's Mauna Loa Eruption: Stunning Video Shows Lava Spewing, Reaching Heights of 164 Feet into the Air

'Genderfluid' Biden Official Sam Brinton Charged with Stealing a Woman's Luggage

Biden Wants Your Retirement Savings to Go Woke. Here Are 3 Ways to Protect Yourself

'They Brought This On Themselves': DeSantis Fires Back After Disney's Bob Iger Regrets Being 'Dragged' into Parental Rights

School Board Walks Out after Being Confronted with Trans Material by Parents; Meanwhile, Doctors Confirm Dangers of 'Gender-Affirming Care'

Senate Ignores Conservative Concerns, Passes Democrats' Same-Sex 'Marriage' Bill With 12 Republican Votes

'Great Reset in Full Force': Dutch Government Plans to Shut Down Up To 3,000 Farms to Meet EU Green Goals

Disney's 'Strange World' Tanks, Indicates Woke Film Movement Is Failing: 'Why Does Everything Have to Be Sexualized?'

Walmart Shooter's Suicide Note: 'I Failed to Listen to the Groans of the Holy Spirit'

Focus on the Family Blamed for Club Q Shooting Despite Jim Daly Condemnation, Suspect's Non-Binary Identity

Medical Clinic Treating People Injured by COVID Shot Opens in Italy

Christian Organization Wins Legal Battle, Will Be Allowed to Hire Christians

'Pregnant Workers' Bill Could Force Businesses to Pay for Abortions, Trample Religious Liberty

Same-Sex Marriage Bill Advances as Republicans Warn of Endless Litigation against Faith-Based Groups

Ancient Christian Monastery Discovered in Middle East Predates Emergence of Islam

Chinese Protestors in 8 Cities Angry over Draconian COVID Lockdown: 'End the Dictatorship'

Former DHS Disinformation Head Files as Foreign Agent

Trans Ideologues Shouldn't Set Medical Standards

Biden Admin Approves Oil Production, but You Won't Believe Where



Search the Articles Archives

Keyword:  
Author:  
Words Posted On:  
Day Month Year



BCN Plus

Follow BCN on Twitter
Are You Praying for Our Government Leaders?
BCN Staff

Steve Shultz
Steve Shultz, Managing Editor
Founder and Owner


Aimee Herd
Aimee Herd, Editor


BCN Plus
Are You Praying for President Trump?
 
 

All articles on this site and emails from BCN are copyrighted property of Breaking Christian News. Permission is given to link to, or share a BCN story if proper attribution is given to both the original writer and summarizer of the story. Breaking Christian News 2005-2019. All Rights Reserved.


Breaking Christian News is a division of Elijah List Publications, Inc. All Rights Reserved


Disclaimer: Articles and links, as well as the source articles linked to; do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Breaking Christian News.

editor@breakingchristiannews.com