A Mulligan for the Supreme Court

Bill Markin : Jan 6, 2023
American Thinker

...Rayland Brunson, who is arguing the case by and for himself (although he is now been joined by his three brothers) contends that "When the allegations of a rigged election came forward, the Respondents had a duty under law to investigate it or be removed from office. An honest and fair election can only be supported by legal votes, this is sacred. It is the basis of our US Republican Form of Government protected by the US Constitution."

[AmericanThinker.com] [The following article is excerpted, read it in its entirety at the link below] Many would argue that the Supreme Court had a terrible "first shot" in regards to the election of 2020, when they refused to become involved in the many issues raised by the Presidential election... (Image: Pixabay)

As a result, [we've] seen nearly two years of the rapid destruction of our nation...

Fortunately, there are cases currently before the Supreme Court that offer them the opportunity for a "do-over."

The most creative and far-reaching of these is Brunson v. Adams, in which a Utah man asserts that, because a substantial number of members of Congress refused to consider claims of election fraud prior to certifying the electors, they had failed their duty under their oath to protect the country from all enemies, foreign and domestic, and therefore should not only be removed from office, but disqualified from holding any future office.

Rayland Brunson ... contends that "When the allegations of a rigged election came forward, the Respondents had a duty under law to investigate it or be removed from office..."

Brunson suggests that the court simply order a federal marshal be dispatched to Congress to inform them that these individuals ... have been removed from their office, and that President Trump be reinstated...Subscribe for free to Breaking Christian News here

Read this article in its entirety HERE.