Breaking Christian News - Printer-Friendly Version

FBI Had 8 Spies Inside Proud Boys Before January 6 and It Raises Big Questions

Victoria Taft : Nov 16, 2022
PJ Media

The informant revelation raises again the biggest questions never asked and answered during the January 6 congressional show trial. Why didn't Nancy Pelosi's Capitol Police act on intelligence that there would be unrest that day and why didn't the cops harden the target in advance? Nancy Pelosi also exempted herself and most officers from the query by the panel. Why?..

[PJMedia.com] The January 6, 2021, march-turned-melee at the Capitol happened when bad actors blew through police barricades to get inside while scores of others were allowed in by Capitol Police. The two-hour spasm of unrest and banshee-like behavior consisted of scaring the Hell out of senators, injuring cops, sitting in Nancy Pelosi's chair, and setting a political narrative that continues to this day. (Screengrab image)

Now comes confirmation that the FBI had spies inside one group that day. This revelation raises more questions.

"The existence of the informants came to light over the past few days in a flurry of veiled court filings by defense lawyers for five members of the Proud Boys," wrote The New York Times.

The revelation came during a closed hearing for five of the group's members who go on trial next month on seditious conspiracy charges related to the J-6 breach.

Attorneys for the five Proud Boys members want full disclosure of informants' communications with the FBI because they believe the official record would show there was no conspiracy to storm the Capitol that day and absolve Enrique Tarrio, Joe Biggs, Ethan Nordean, Zachary Rehl, and Dominic Pezzola of the charges. Indeed, their attorneys asked for charges to be dropped against the defendants.

The New York Times reported that a previous informant infiltrating the Proud Boys in Kansas City reported there was no conspiracy to storm the Capitol, though "as a relatively low-level member of the group it is possible that he was simply not privy to the making of such plans."

Put another way: If they knew people were preparing to storm the Capitol on January 6, 2021, why didn't they stop it instead of admitting the public to become victims?

The January 6 event has never made sense to me. The J-6 stuff as well as the Gretchen Whitmer "fednapping," as reporter Julie Kelly calls it, have always struck me as one big put-up job. A psy-op. Both were run by the same FBI overseer and were conveniently rolled out at politically opportune times to reflect the worst caricatures the Left has of the right. We knew Enrique Tarrio had been an FBI informant and was barred from Washington, DC before January 6 for tearing down a BLM banner.

Kelly reported during the first Whitmer trial, in which two defendants were found not guilty, how one FBI informant "along with other FBI informants, posed as leaders of two ‘militia' groups, at least one of which was created by the FBI." So we know what the FBI is capable of and how much manpower they're willing to expend.

The defendants were found guilty in a second trial but the questions piled up. If the FBI hadn't been driving the conspiracy, would it have existed? As one of the public defenders said at trial, the FBI's behavior is "unacceptable in America. That's not how it works. They don't make terrorists so we can arrest them."

I'm no conspiracy theorist, but sometimes people really are out to get you—like the FBI. Maybe this is exactly "how it works"... Subscribe for free to Breaking Christian News here

Continue reading here.